Edited new vignette for possible function naming inconsistencies #81
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Line 497 of the .RMD file refers to the `transmogrifty()` function, but the illustration appears to refer to the function as `mogrify()`; line 533 references `add_new()`, but the function looks to be `add_variable()`.
Current coverage is 97.27% (diff: 100%)@@ master #81 diff @@
==========================================
Files 15 15
Lines 354 367 +13
Methods 0 0
Messages 0 0
Branches 0 0
==========================================
+ Hits 348 357 +9
- Misses 6 10 +4
Partials 0 0
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Line 497 of the .RMD file refers to the
transmogrifty()function, butthe illustration appears to refer to the function as
mogrify(); line533 references
add_new(), but the function looks to beadd_variable().