odroidgo2-joypad: only flush once if an event occurred #399
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- Call event_sync() at most once per poll event
mo123
pushed a commit
to mo123/linux-4.19
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 16, 2022
[ Upstream commit 6c2e3bf ] This patch fixes the following crash by receiving a invalid message: [ 160.672220] ================================================================== [ 160.676206] BUG: KASAN: user-memory-access in dlm_user_add_ast+0xc3/0x370 [ 160.679659] Read of size 8 at addr 00000000deadbeef by task kworker/u32:13/319 [ 160.681447] [ 160.681824] CPU: 10 PID: 319 Comm: kworker/u32:13 Not tainted 5.14.0-rc2+ hardkernel#399 [ 160.683472] Hardware name: Red Hat KVM/RHEL-AV, BIOS 1.14.0-1.module+el8.6.0+12648+6ede71a5 04/01/2014 [ 160.685574] Workqueue: dlm_recv process_recv_sockets [ 160.686721] Call Trace: [ 160.687310] dump_stack_lvl+0x56/0x6f [ 160.688169] ? dlm_user_add_ast+0xc3/0x370 [ 160.689116] kasan_report.cold.14+0x116/0x11b [ 160.690138] ? dlm_user_add_ast+0xc3/0x370 [ 160.690832] dlm_user_add_ast+0xc3/0x370 [ 160.691502] _receive_unlock_reply+0x103/0x170 [ 160.692241] _receive_message+0x11df/0x1ec0 [ 160.692926] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0xa1/0xd0 [ 160.693700] ? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0xb0/0xb0 [ 160.694427] ? lock_acquire+0x175/0x400 [ 160.695058] ? do_purge.isra.51+0x200/0x200 [ 160.695744] ? lock_acquired+0x360/0x5d0 [ 160.696400] ? lock_contended+0x6a0/0x6a0 [ 160.697055] ? lock_release+0x21d/0x5e0 [ 160.697686] ? lock_is_held_type+0xe0/0x110 [ 160.698352] ? lock_is_held_type+0xe0/0x110 [ 160.699026] ? ___might_sleep+0x1cc/0x1e0 [ 160.699698] ? dlm_wait_requestqueue+0x94/0x140 [ 160.700451] ? dlm_process_requestqueue+0x240/0x240 [ 160.701249] ? down_write_killable+0x2b0/0x2b0 [ 160.701988] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0xa2/0x130 [ 160.702690] dlm_receive_buffer+0x1a5/0x210 [ 160.703385] dlm_process_incoming_buffer+0x726/0x9f0 [ 160.704210] receive_from_sock+0x1c0/0x3b0 [ 160.704886] ? dlm_tcp_shutdown+0x30/0x30 [ 160.705561] ? lock_acquire+0x175/0x400 [ 160.706197] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0xa1/0xd0 [ 160.706941] ? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0xb0/0xb0 [ 160.707681] process_recv_sockets+0x32/0x40 [ 160.708366] process_one_work+0x55e/0xad0 [ 160.709045] ? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x110/0x110 [ 160.709820] worker_thread+0x65/0x5e0 [ 160.710423] ? process_one_work+0xad0/0xad0 [ 160.711087] kthread+0x1ed/0x220 [ 160.711628] ? set_kthread_struct+0x80/0x80 [ 160.712314] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 The issue is that we received a DLM message for a user lock but the destination lock is a kernel lock. Note that the address which is trying to derefence is 00000000deadbeef, which is in a kernel lock lkb->lkb_astparam, this field should never be derefenced by the DLM kernel stack. In case of a user lock lkb->lkb_astparam is lkb->lkb_ua (memory is shared by a union field). The struct lkb_ua will be handled by the DLM kernel stack but on a kernel lock it will contain invalid data and ends in most likely crashing the kernel. It can be reproduced with two cluster nodes. node 2: dlm_tool join test echo "862 fooobaar 1 2 1" > /sys/kernel/debug/dlm/test_locks echo "862 3 1" > /sys/kernel/debug/dlm/test_waiters node 1: dlm_tool join test python: foo = DLM(h_cmd=3, o_nextcmd=1, h_nodeid=1, h_lockspace=0x77222027, \ m_type=7, m_flags=0x1, m_remid=0x862, m_result=0xFFFEFFFE) newFile = open("/sys/kernel/debug/dlm/comms/2/rawmsg", "wb") newFile.write(bytes(foo)) Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
mdrjr
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 19, 2022
[ Upstream commit 6c2e3bf ] This patch fixes the following crash by receiving a invalid message: [ 160.672220] ================================================================== [ 160.676206] BUG: KASAN: user-memory-access in dlm_user_add_ast+0xc3/0x370 [ 160.679659] Read of size 8 at addr 00000000deadbeef by task kworker/u32:13/319 [ 160.681447] [ 160.681824] CPU: 10 PID: 319 Comm: kworker/u32:13 Not tainted 5.14.0-rc2+ #399 [ 160.683472] Hardware name: Red Hat KVM/RHEL-AV, BIOS 1.14.0-1.module+el8.6.0+12648+6ede71a5 04/01/2014 [ 160.685574] Workqueue: dlm_recv process_recv_sockets [ 160.686721] Call Trace: [ 160.687310] dump_stack_lvl+0x56/0x6f [ 160.688169] ? dlm_user_add_ast+0xc3/0x370 [ 160.689116] kasan_report.cold.14+0x116/0x11b [ 160.690138] ? dlm_user_add_ast+0xc3/0x370 [ 160.690832] dlm_user_add_ast+0xc3/0x370 [ 160.691502] _receive_unlock_reply+0x103/0x170 [ 160.692241] _receive_message+0x11df/0x1ec0 [ 160.692926] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0xa1/0xd0 [ 160.693700] ? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0xb0/0xb0 [ 160.694427] ? lock_acquire+0x175/0x400 [ 160.695058] ? do_purge.isra.51+0x200/0x200 [ 160.695744] ? lock_acquired+0x360/0x5d0 [ 160.696400] ? lock_contended+0x6a0/0x6a0 [ 160.697055] ? lock_release+0x21d/0x5e0 [ 160.697686] ? lock_is_held_type+0xe0/0x110 [ 160.698352] ? lock_is_held_type+0xe0/0x110 [ 160.699026] ? ___might_sleep+0x1cc/0x1e0 [ 160.699698] ? dlm_wait_requestqueue+0x94/0x140 [ 160.700451] ? dlm_process_requestqueue+0x240/0x240 [ 160.701249] ? down_write_killable+0x2b0/0x2b0 [ 160.701988] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0xa2/0x130 [ 160.702690] dlm_receive_buffer+0x1a5/0x210 [ 160.703385] dlm_process_incoming_buffer+0x726/0x9f0 [ 160.704210] receive_from_sock+0x1c0/0x3b0 [ 160.704886] ? dlm_tcp_shutdown+0x30/0x30 [ 160.705561] ? lock_acquire+0x175/0x400 [ 160.706197] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0xa1/0xd0 [ 160.706941] ? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0xb0/0xb0 [ 160.707681] process_recv_sockets+0x32/0x40 [ 160.708366] process_one_work+0x55e/0xad0 [ 160.709045] ? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x110/0x110 [ 160.709820] worker_thread+0x65/0x5e0 [ 160.710423] ? process_one_work+0xad0/0xad0 [ 160.711087] kthread+0x1ed/0x220 [ 160.711628] ? set_kthread_struct+0x80/0x80 [ 160.712314] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 The issue is that we received a DLM message for a user lock but the destination lock is a kernel lock. Note that the address which is trying to derefence is 00000000deadbeef, which is in a kernel lock lkb->lkb_astparam, this field should never be derefenced by the DLM kernel stack. In case of a user lock lkb->lkb_astparam is lkb->lkb_ua (memory is shared by a union field). The struct lkb_ua will be handled by the DLM kernel stack but on a kernel lock it will contain invalid data and ends in most likely crashing the kernel. It can be reproduced with two cluster nodes. node 2: dlm_tool join test echo "862 fooobaar 1 2 1" > /sys/kernel/debug/dlm/test_locks echo "862 3 1" > /sys/kernel/debug/dlm/test_waiters node 1: dlm_tool join test python: foo = DLM(h_cmd=3, o_nextcmd=1, h_nodeid=1, h_lockspace=0x77222027, \ m_type=7, m_flags=0x1, m_remid=0x862, m_result=0xFFFEFFFE) newFile = open("/sys/kernel/debug/dlm/comms/2/rawmsg", "wb") newFile.write(bytes(foo)) Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This should be the default behavior according to the kernel documentation. This should also reduce some overhead of calling sync ever single poll.