Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Snyk] Upgrade @mui/material from 5.16.7 to 5.16.8 #3348

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

[Snyk] Upgrade @mui/material from 5.16.7 to 5.16.8 #3348

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

swirlds-automation
Copy link
Contributor

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade @mui/material from 5.16.7 to 5.16.8.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.

  • The recommended version is 1 version ahead of your current version.

  • The recommended version was released 22 days ago.

Release notes
Package name: @mui/material from @mui/material GitHub release notes

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

@snyk-bot
fix: upgrade @mui/material from 5.16.7 to 5.16.8
9d4b65e 
Snyk has created this PR to upgrade @mui/material from 5.16.7 to 5.16.8.

See this package in npm:
@mui/material

See this project in Snyk:
https://app.snyk.io/org/json-rpc-relay/project/baf29319-5e17-4aff-8e1f-4108d3e10c45?utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&page=upgrade-pr
@sonarqubecloud SonarQubeCloud
Copy link

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

@codecov Codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 20, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.04%. Comparing base (13d09e9) to head (9d4b65e).

Additional details and impacted files 
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3348      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   85.04%   84.04%   -1.01%     
==========================================
  Files          65       69       +4     
  Lines        4508     4688     +180     
  Branches     1023     1050      +27     
==========================================
+ Hits         3834     3940     +106     
- Misses        330      421      +91     
+ Partials      344      327      -17
Flag Coverage Δ
config-service 98.14% <ø> (ø)
relay 79.72% <ø> (ø)
server 83.28% <ø> (?)
ws-server 36.66% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 17 files with indirect coverage changes

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

Test Results

 25 files  + 2  393 suites  +44   1h 7m 8s ⏱️ + 17m 56s
615 tests  -  2  600 ✅  -  3  4 💤 ±0  11 ❌ +1 
952 runs  +43  934 ✅ +45  4 💤  - 3  14 ❌ +1 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit 9d4b65e. ± Comparison against base commit 13d09e9.

This pull request removes 5 and adds 3 tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both. 
"before all" hook for "emits an approval event" ‑ RPC Server Acceptance Tests Acceptance tests @erc20 Acceptance Tests HTS token should behave like erc20 transfer from when the token owner is not the zero address when the recipient is not the zero address when the spender has enough allowance "before all" hook for "emits an approval event"
"before all" hook for "reverts" ‑ RPC Server Acceptance Tests Acceptance tests @erc20 Acceptance Tests HTS token should behave like erc20 transfer from when the token owner is not the zero address when the recipient is not the zero address when the spender does not have enough allowance when the token owner has enough balance "before all" hook for "reverts"
"before all" hook in "Debug API Test Suite" ‑ RPC Server Acceptance Tests Acceptance tests @api-batch-3 RPC Server Acceptance Tests Debug API Test Suite "before all" hook in "Debug API Test Suite"
"before each" hook for "reverts" ‑ RPC Server Acceptance Tests Acceptance tests @erc20 Acceptance Tests HTS token should behave like erc20 transfer from when the token owner is not the zero address when the recipient is not the zero address when the spender does not have enough allowance "before each" hook for "reverts"
"before each" hook for "should execute "eth_getStorageAt" request to get current state changes" ‑ RPC Server Acceptance Tests Acceptance tests @api-batch-2 RPC Server Acceptance Tests "before each" hook for "should execute "eth_getStorageAt" request to get current state changes"

"before all" hook for "should execute "eth_getCode" for hts token" ‑ RPC Server Acceptance Tests Acceptance tests @api-batch-2 RPC Server Acceptance Tests eth_getCode "before all" hook for "should execute "eth_getCode" for hts token"
"before all" hook in "@api-batch-2 RPC Server Acceptance Tests" ‑ RPC Server Acceptance Tests Acceptance tests @api-batch-2 RPC Server Acceptance Tests "before all" hook in "@api-batch-2 RPC Server Acceptance Tests"
"before each" hook for "should execute "eth_getStorageAt" request against an inactive address (contains no data) and receive a 32-byte-zero-hex string " ‑ RPC Server Acceptance Tests Acceptance tests @api-batch-2 RPC Server Acceptance Tests "before each" hook for "should execute "eth_getStorageAt" request against an inactive address (contains no data) and receive a 32-byte-zero-hex string "

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@georgi-l95 georgi-l95 Awaiting requested review from georgi-l95 georgi-l95 is a code owner

@Ivo-Yankov Ivo-Yankov Awaiting requested review from Ivo-Yankov Ivo-Yankov is a code owner

At least 2 approving reviews are required to merge this pull request.

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@swirlds-automation @snyk-bot