Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

scheduler/csi: fix early return when multiple volumes are requested #10143

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 10, 2021

Conversation

tgross
Copy link
Member

@tgross tgross commented Mar 9, 2021

When multiple CSI volumes are requested, the feasibility check could return
early for read/write volumes with free claims, even if a later volume in the
request was not feasible for any other reason (including not existing at
all). This can result in random failure to fail feasibility checking,
depending on how the map of volumes was being ordered at runtime.

Remove the early return from the feasibility check. Add a test to verify that
missing volumes in the map will cause a failure; this test will not catch a
regression every test run because of the random map ordering, but any failure
will be caught over the course of several CI runs.

Discovered the hard way while working on #10136 for #7877.

When multiple CSI volumes are requested, the feasibility check could return
early for read/write volumes with free claims, even if a later volume in the
request was not feasible for any other reason (including not existing at
all). This can result in random failure to fail feasibility checking,
depending on how the map of volumes was being ordered at runtime.

Remove the early return from the feasibility check. Add a test to verify that
missing volumes in the map will cause a failure; this test will not catch a
regression every test run because of the random map ordering, but any failure
will be caught over the course of several CI runs.
Copy link
Member

@shoenig shoenig left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM; was scratching my head for a while before realizing I needed to expand the diff and see the outer loop 🤔

@tgross tgross merged commit b66a341 into main Mar 10, 2021
@tgross tgross deleted the b-csi-multiple-volume branch March 10, 2021 20:18
@github-actions
Copy link

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 120 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 22, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants