CSI: reorder controller volume detachment #12387
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
tgross
force-pushed
the
b-csi-volume-detach-order
branch
from
40cde4c
to
4a46d82
Compare
In #12112 and #12113 we solved for the problem of races in releasing volume claims, but there was a case that we missed. During a node drain with a controller attach/detach, we can hit a race where we call controller publish before the unpublish has completed. This is discouraged in the spec but plugins are supposed to handle it safely. But if the storage provider's API is slow enough and the plugin doesn't handle the case safely, the volume can get "locked" into a state where the provider's API won't detach it cleanly. Check the claim before making any external controller publish RPC calls so that Nomad is responsible for the canonical information about whether a volume is currently claimed. This has a couple side-effects that also had to get fixed here: * Changing the order means that the volume will have a past claim without a valid external node ID because it came from the client, and this uncovered a separate bug where we didn't assert the external node ID was valid before returning it. Fallthrough to getting the ID from the plugins in the state store in this case. We avoided this originally because of concerns around plugins getting lost during node drain but now that we've fixed that we may want to revisit it in future work. * We should make sure we're handling `FailedPrecondition` cases from the controller plugin the same way we handle other retryable cases. * Several tests had to be updated because they were assuming we fail in a particular order that we're no longer doing.
tgross
force-pushed
the
b-csi-volume-detach-order
branch
from
4a46d82
to
2639770
Compare
lgfa29
added
backport/1.1.x
This was referenced Apr 20, 2022
|
I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 120 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions. |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Ran into this while working on #12384
In #12112 and #12113 we solved for the problem of races in releasing
volume claims, but there was a case that we missed. During a node
drain with a controller attach/detach, we can hit a race where we call
controller publish before the unpublish has completed. This is
discouraged in the spec but plugins are supposed to handle it
safely. But if the storage provider's API is slow enough and the
plugin doesn't handle the case safely, the volume can get "locked"
into a state where the provider's API won't detach it cleanly.
Check the claim before making any external controller publish RPC
calls so that Nomad is responsible for the canonical information about
whether a volume is currently claimed.
This has a couple side-effects that also had to get fixed here:
without a valid external node ID because it came from the client, and
this uncovered a separate bug where we didn't assert the external node
ID was valid before returning it. Fallthrough to getting the ID from
the plugins in the state store in this case. We avoided this
originally because of concerns around plugins getting lost during node
drain but now that we've fixed that we may want to revisit it in
future work.
FailedPreconditioncases fromthe controller plugin the same way we handle other retryable cases.
in a particular order that we're no longer doing.
No changelog entry because this is updating code that hasn't yet shipped.
Fixed E2E test from #12384