Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Backport of core: reschedule evicted batch job when resources become available into release/1.3.x #13210

Conversation

hc-github-team-nomad-core
Copy link
Contributor

Backport

This PR is auto-generated from #13205 to be assessed for backporting due to the inclusion of the label backport/1.3.x.

The below text is copied from the body of the original PR.


This PR fixes a bug where an evicted batch job would not be rescheduled
once resources become available.

Intuition: previously the scheduler would filter an alloc that was evicted but its tasked completed successfully. The problem is that that tasks were stopped because of the eviction stop signal, not because they had run to completion. Such an alloc needs to be queued to run again.

Closes #9890

@hc-github-team-nomad-core hc-github-team-nomad-core force-pushed the backport/b-batch-preempt2/early-amusing-aardvark branch from 349cfd3 to 03c231f Compare June 2, 2022 21:32
@hc-github-team-nomad-core hc-github-team-nomad-core merged commit 832e97e into release/1.3.x Jun 2, 2022
@hc-github-team-nomad-core hc-github-team-nomad-core deleted the backport/b-batch-preempt2/early-amusing-aardvark branch June 2, 2022 21:32
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 9, 2022

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 120 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 9, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants