-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
scheduler: count implicit spread targets as a single target #17195
Merged
+179
−11
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
3165b83
to
b71d607
Compare
970e2c9
to
9cd0490
Compare
shoenig
approved these changes
May 16, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
9cd0490
to
057cd78
Compare
When calculating the score in the `SpreadIterator`, the score boost is proportional to the difference between the current and desired count. But when there are implicit spread targets, the current count is the sum of the possible implicit targets, which results in incorrect scoring unless there's only one implicit target. This changeset updates the `propertySet` struct to accept a set of explicit target values so it can detect when a property value falls into the implicit set and should be combined with other implicit values. Fixes: #11823
057cd78
to
aeeb3f9
Compare
tgross
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 17, 2023
When calculating the score in the `SpreadIterator`, the score boost is proportional to the difference between the current and desired count. But when there are implicit spread targets, the current count is the sum of the possible implicit targets, which results in incorrect scoring unless there's only one implicit target. This changeset updates the `propertySet` struct to accept a set of explicit target values so it can detect when a property value falls into the implicit set and should be combined with other implicit values. Fixes: #11823
tgross
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 17, 2023
When calculating the score in the `SpreadIterator`, the score boost is proportional to the difference between the current and desired count. But when there are implicit spread targets, the current count is the sum of the possible implicit targets, which results in incorrect scoring unless there's only one implicit target. This changeset updates the `propertySet` struct to accept a set of explicit target values so it can detect when a property value falls into the implicit set and should be combined with other implicit values. Fixes: #11823
tgross
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 17, 2023
When calculating the score in the `SpreadIterator`, the score boost is proportional to the difference between the current and desired count. But when there are implicit spread targets, the current count is the sum of the possible implicit targets, which results in incorrect scoring unless there's only one implicit target. This changeset updates the `propertySet` struct to accept a set of explicit target values so it can detect when a property value falls into the implicit set and should be combined with other implicit values. Fixes: #11823
tgross
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 17, 2023
When calculating the score in the `SpreadIterator`, the score boost is proportional to the difference between the current and desired count. But when there are implicit spread targets, the current count is the sum of the possible implicit targets, which results in incorrect scoring unless there's only one implicit target. This changeset updates the `propertySet` struct to accept a set of explicit target values so it can detect when a property value falls into the implicit set and should be combined with other implicit values. Fixes: #11823
tgross
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 17, 2023
When calculating the score in the `SpreadIterator`, the score boost is proportional to the difference between the current and desired count. But when there are implicit spread targets, the current count is the sum of the possible implicit targets, which results in incorrect scoring unless there's only one implicit target. This changeset updates the `propertySet` struct to accept a set of explicit target values so it can detect when a property value falls into the implicit set and should be combined with other implicit values. Fixes: #11823
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When calculating the score in the
SpreadIterator
, the score boost is proportional to the difference between the current and desired count. But when there are implicit spread targets, the current count is the sum of the possible implicit targets, which results in incorrect scoring unless there's only one implicit target.This changeset updates the
propertySet
struct to accept a set of explicit target values so it can detect when a property value falls into the implicit set and should be combined with other implicit values.Fixes: #11823