Move logic for event display message to task_runner #3476
Conversation
preetapan
changed the title
nomad/structs/structs.go
Outdated
| @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ const ( | |||
| ACLTokenUpsertRequestType | |||
| ACLTokenDeleteRequestType | |||
| ACLTokenBootstrapRequestType | |||
| ReasonWithinPolicy = "Restart within policy" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This seems out of place... At least put a space between it and the "enum" above + a comment describing its intended purpose.
|
|
||
| func (event *TaskEvent) PopulateEventDisplayMessage() { | ||
| // Build up the description based on the event type. | ||
| if event == nil { //TODO PA needs investigation alloc_runner's Run method sends a nil event when sigterming nomad. Why? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hm, interesting. I don't see anywhere in here that taskDestroyEvent could still be nil by the time r.destroyTaskRunners(taskDestroyEvent) is called.
However I do feel like event being nil can intentionally happen (perhaps to cause a sync without changing the task's state?) -- I just can't find where now...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I saw it only when shutting down, and it always consistently happened during shutdown. Haven't found the root cause yet..
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hm if it's dev mode we destroy/GC all allocations on shutdown, so Nomad would be breaking out of that OUTER loop in AllocRunner.Run and hitting the AllocRunner.handleDestroy() code path if that helps.
| Time: time.Now().UnixNano(), | ||
| Type: event, | ||
| Time: time.Now().UnixNano(), | ||
| Details: make(map[string]string), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why is this a map of type -> details instead of just being a string containing the details? It doesn't seem like we'd ever have an event with multiple detail entries but maybe I'm missing something?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
(If we want to keep this a map perhaps we should create a global static map of "Types -> String Keys" instead of hardcoding the strings below?)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Created this because we want to get rid of the many fields like ErrorReason/KillReason etc and there can be more than one entry for a single event (e.g kill_signal and kill_reason)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
(Oops, left a comment in the wrong place; editing)
Ah! Makes sense. I must have missed the descriptive comment on the field.
command/alloc_status.go
Outdated
| parts = append(parts, fmt.Sprintf("Exit Code: %d", event.ExitCode)) | ||
| if event.DisplayMessage != "" { | ||
| formattedTime := formatUnixNanoTime(event.Time) | ||
| events[size-i] = fmt.Sprintf("%s|%s|%s", formattedTime, event.Type, event.DisplayMessage) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe make a named variable
| Details map[string]string | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| func (event *TaskEvent) PopulateEventDisplayMessage() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe have a couple basic tests for a sanity check.
|
@schmichael yes I meant to commit generated code, I've added new fields to the API. This is needed until we make the workflow change we talked about. |
preetapan
force-pushed
the
f-event-messages-api
branch
from
3b7090e
to
ef98e24
Compare
Publishing metrics for job summary
preetapan
force-pushed
the
b-nomad-0.7.1
branch
from
14b601b
to
af7ff0c
Compare
merge nomad 0.7.1 branch
Fixes a typo in the check restart doc.
…lient initiated updates
… two new fields DisplayMessage and Details.
preetapan
force-pushed
the
f-event-messages-api
branch
from
ef98e24
to
a8211b1
Compare
|
Closing this one, will open a new one against master |
|
I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 120 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions. |
Adds two new fields DisplayMessage and Details.
Needs some more unit test updates
This fixes #3399