Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Blocked evaluation fixes #4847

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 8, 2018
Merged

Conversation

dadgar
Copy link
Contributor

@dadgar dadgar commented Nov 7, 2018

This PR has two blocked evaluation fixes:

  1. Job tracking in the blocked eval tracker now handles namespaces
  2. Improve cancelling of duplicate blocked evaluations such that new
    information is not lost

The old logic for cancelling duplicate blocked evaluations by job id had
the issue where the newer evaluation could have additional node classes
that it is (in)eligible for that we would not capture. This could make
it such that cluster state could change such that the job would make
progress but no evaluation was unblocked.
@dadgar dadgar changed the base branch from master to b-deployment-progress-deadline November 7, 2018 18:25
nomad/blocked_evals.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@dadgar dadgar merged commit 1e3a20f into b-deployment-progress-deadline Nov 8, 2018
@dadgar dadgar deleted the b-blocked-eval branch November 8, 2018 21:40
@github-actions
Copy link

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 120 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 25, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants