Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reverts #6703 #7114

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

Reverts #6703 #7114

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

drewbailey
Copy link
Contributor

This PR reverts changes introduced in #6703 that made changes to
affinities and spreads cause destructive updates.

#6988 outlines good reason to
rethink this until we have scheduler functionality in place that treats
and update to spread/affinity similar to how count changes are handled
(rebalancing the difference instead of rescheduling all allocs).

This PR reverts changes introduced in #6703 that made changes to
affinities and spreads cause destructive updates.

#6988 outlines good reason to
rethink this until we have scheduler functionality in place that treats
and update to spread/affinity similar to how count changes are handled
(rebalancing the difference instead of rescheduling all allocs).
@drewbailey drewbailey closed this Feb 11, 2020
@drewbailey drewbailey deleted the b-remove-affinity-spread-check branch February 11, 2020 16:12
@github-actions
Copy link

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 120 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 18, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant