-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[wip] resource/aws_ses_receipt_rule: support import functionality #6237
Conversation
44fa4a1
to
1fb5a10
Compare
After doing some more looking at other resources with imports, it appears this isn't quite the right approach since it won't import the whole state (with all of the more complicated rules and whatnot). Ideally, we could use I'm not sure what the policy is for changing the ID format, so I'd appreciate some feedback on what the best approach to implement this is 😄 |
Hi @acburdine! 👋 Thanks for submitting this. We currently denote changing resource IDs as a major version breaking change since some folks might be relying on the attribute in other references. See also: https://www.terraform.io/docs/extend/best-practices/versioning.html#example-major-number-increments During import, we only need to |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi again, @acburdine. 👋 Since we haven't heard back from you for awhile and the fix was trivial, I added a commit after yours so we could get this feature in.
--- PASS: TestAccAWSSESReceiptRule_actions (12.99s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSSESReceiptRule_basic (12.99s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSSESReceiptRule_order (16.54s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSSESReceiptRule_s3Action (28.28s)
This has been released in version 1.44.0 of the AWS provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading. |
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. Thanks! |
Changes proposed in this pull request:
Output from acceptance testing:
Haven't run it yet, waiting on response to the below comment.