Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade dataprotection API version from 2022-04-01 to 2023-05-01 #24143

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 14, 2023

Conversation

sinbai
Copy link
Contributor

@sinbai sinbai commented Dec 7, 2023

Two points to note:

  • Although the stable API 2023-08-01 for dataprotection is available , it is not yet public, therefore upgraded to 2023-05-01.

  • Confirmed with the service team that SnapshotStore was replaced with OperationalStore . Since this is a breaking change, it should be updated from TF 4.0.

Copy link
Member

@jackofallops jackofallops left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @sinbai - Thanks for this PR, just a couple of questions that need a look below.

Thanks

@@ -84,6 +74,32 @@ func resourceDataProtectionBackupVault() *pluginsdk.Resource {
"tags": tags.Schema(),
},
}

// Confirm with the service team that `SnapshotStore` has been replaced with `OperationalStore`.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this a question that still needs answering by the service team?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, this has been confirmed by the service team.

Comment on lines 84 to 88
ValidateFunc: validation.StringInSlice([]string{
string(backupvaults.StorageSettingStoreTypesArchiveStore),
"SnapshotStore",
string(backupvaults.StorageSettingStoreTypesVaultStore),
}, false),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there a reason not to include the new backupvaults.StorageSettingStoreTypesOperationalStore here also? Or is there a reason to wait for 4.0 to support it?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's a good idea to include backupvaults.StorageSettingStoreTypesOperationalStore, the code has been updated. Could you please take another look?

@sinbai
Copy link
Contributor Author

sinbai commented Dec 8, 2023

Hi @sinbai - Thanks for this PR, just a couple of questions that need a look below.

Thanks

Hi @jackofallops thanks for your time. Could you please take another look?

Copy link
Collaborator

@katbyte katbyte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🌵

@katbyte katbyte merged commit 8917a92 into hashicorp:main Dec 14, 2023
25 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v3.85.0 milestone Dec 14, 2023
katbyte added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 14, 2023
dduportal pushed a commit to jenkins-infra/azure that referenced this pull request Dec 15, 2023
<Actions>
<action
id="f410411e63aff4bb73a81c2aec1d373cf8a903e63b30dee2006b0030d8a94cc8">
        <h3>Bump Terraform `azurerm` provider version</h3>
<details
id="1d9343c012f5434ac9fe8a98135bae3667b399259be16d9b14302ea3bd424a24">
            <summary>Update Terraform lock file</summary>
<p>&#34;hashicorp/azurerm&#34; updated from &#34;3.84.0&#34; to
&#34;3.85.0&#34; in file &#34;.terraform.lock.hcl&#34;</p>
            <details>
                <summary>3.85.0</summary>
<pre>Changelog retrieved
from:&#xA;&#x9;https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/releases/tag/v3.85.0&#xA;FEATURES:&#xA;&#xA;*
New Data Source: `azurerm_locations`
([#23324](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23324
New Resource: `azurerm_iotcentral_organization`
([#23132](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23132))&#xA;&#xA;ENHANCEMENTS:&#xA;&#xA;*
provider: support for authenticating using Azure Kubernetes Service
Workload Identity
([#23965](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23965
dependencies: updating to `v0.65.0` of
`github.com/hashicorp/go-azure-helpers`
([#24222](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24222
dependencies: updating to `v0.20231214.1220802` of
`github.com/hashicorp/go-azure-sdk`
([#24246](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24246
dependencies: updating to version `v0.20231214.1160726` of
`github.com/hashicorp/go-azure-sdk`
([#24241](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24241
dependencies: update `security/automation` to use
`hashicorp/go-azure-sdk`
([#24156](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24156
`dataprotection`: updating to API Version `2023-05-01`
([#24143](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24143
`kusto`: removing the remnants of the old Resource ID Parsers now this
uses `hashicorp/go-azure-sdk`
([#24238](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24238
Data Source: `azurerm_cognitive_account` - export the `identity` block
([#24214](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24214
Data Source: `azurerm_monitor_workspace` - add support for the
`default_data_collection_endpoint_id` and
`default_data_collection_rule_id` properties
([#24153](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24153
Data Source: `azurerm_shared_image_gallery` - add support for the
`image_names` property
([#24176](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24176
`azurerm_dns_txt_record` - allow up to `4096` characters for the
property `record.value`
([#24169](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24169
`azurerm_container_app` - support for the `workload_profile_name`
property
([#24219](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24219
`azurerm_container_app` - suppot for the `init_container` block
([#23955](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23955
`azurerm_hpc_cache_blob_nfs_target` - support for the
`verification_timer_in_seconds` and `write_back_timer_in_seconds`
properties
([#24207](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24207
`azurerm_hpc_cache_nfs_target` - support for the
`verification_timer_in_seconds` and `write_back_timer_in_seconds`
properties
([#24208](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24208
`azurerm_linux_web_app` - make `client_secret_setting_name` optional and
conflict with `client_secret_certificate_thumbprint`
([#21834](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#21834
`azurerm_linux_web_app_slot` - make `client_secret_setting_name`
optional and conflict with `client_secret_certificate_thumbprint`
([#21834](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#21834
`azurerm_linux_web_app` - fix a bug in `app_settings` where settings
could be lost
([#24221](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24221
`azurerm_linux_web_app_slot` - fix a bug in `app_settings` where
settings could be lost
([#24221](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24221
`azurerm_log_analytics_workspace` - add support for the
`immediate_data_purge_on_30_days_enabled` property
([#24015](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24015
`azurerm_mssql_server` - support for other identity types for the key
vault key
([#24236](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24236
`azurerm_machine_learning_datastore_blobstorage` - resource now skips
validation when being created
([#24078](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24078
`azurerm_machine_learning_datastore_datalake_gen2` - resource now skips
validation when being created
([#24078](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24078
`azurerm_machine_learning_datastore_fileshare` - resource now skips
validation when being created
([#24078](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24078
`azurerm_monitor_workspace` - support for the
`default_data_collection_endpoint_id` and
`default_data_collection_rule_id` properties
([#24153](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24153
`azurerm_redis_cache` - support for the
`storage_account_subscription_id` property
([#24101](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24101
`azurerm_storage_blob` - support for the `source_content` type `Page`
([#24177](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24177
`azurerm_web_application_firewall_policy` - support new values to the
`rule_group_name` property
([#24194](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24194
`azurerm_windows_web_app` - make the `client_secret_setting_name`
property optional and conflicts with the
`client_secret_certificate_thumbprint` property
([#21834](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#21834
`azurerm_windows_web_app_slot` - make the `client_secret_setting_name`
property optional and conflicts with the
`client_secret_certificate_thumbprint` property
([#21834](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#21834
`azurerm_windows_web_app` - fix a bug in `app_settings` where settings
could be lost
([#24221](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24221
`azurerm_windows_web_app_slot` - fix a bug in `app_settings` where
settings could be lost
([#24221](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24221
`azurerm_cognitive_account` - add `ContentSafety` to the `kind` property
validation
([#24205](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24205))&#xA;&#xA;BUG
FIXES:&#xA;&#xA;* provider: fix an authentication issue with Azure
Storage when running in Azure China cloud
([#24246](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24246
Data Source: `azurerm_role_definition` - fix bug where
`role_definition_id` and `scope` were being incorrectly set
([#24211](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24211
`azurerm_batch_account` - fix bug where `UserAssigned, SystemAssigned`
could be passed to the resource even though it isn&#39;t supported
([#24204](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24204
`azurerm_batch_pool` - fix bug where `settings_json` and
`protected_settings` were not being unmarshaled
([#24075](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24075
`azurerm_bot_service_azure_bot` - fix bug where
`public_network_access_enabled` was being set as the value for `LuisKey`
([#24164](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24164
`azurerm_cognitive_account_customer_managed_key` - `identity_client_id`
is no longer passed to the api when it is empty
([#24231](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24231
`azurerm_linux_web_app_slot` - error when `service_plan_id` is identical
to the parent `service_plan_id`
([#23403](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23403
`azurerm_management_group_template_deployment` - fixing a bug where
`template_spec_version_id` couldn&#39;t be updated
([#24072](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24072
`azurerm_pim_active_role_assignment` - fix an importing issue by
filtering available role assignments based on the provided `scope`
([#24077](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24077
`azurerm_pim_eligible_role_assignment` - fix an importing issue by
filtering available role assignments based on the provided `scope`
([#24077](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24077
`azurerm_resource_group_template_deployment` - fixing a bug where
`template_spec_version_id` couldn&#39;t be updated
([#24072](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24072
`azurerm_security_center_setting` - fix the casing for the
`setting_name` `Sentinel`
([#24210](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24210
`azurerm_storage_account` - Fix crash when checking for
`routingInputs.PublishInternetEndpoints` and
`routingInputs.PublishMicrosoftEndpoints`
([#24228](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24228
`azurerm_storage_share_file` - prevent panic when the file specified by
`source` is empty
([#24179](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24179
`azurerm_subscription_template_deployment` - fixing a bug where
`template_spec_version_id` couldn&#39;t be updated
([#24072](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24072
`azurerm_tenant_template_deployment` - fixing a bug where
`template_spec_version_id` couldn&#39;t be updated
([#24072](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24072
`azurerm_virtual_machine` - prevent a panic by nil checking the first
element of `additional_capabilities`
([#24159](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24159
`azurerm_windows_web_app_slot` - error when `service_plan_id` is
identical to the parent `service_plan_id`
([#23403](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23403))&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;</pre>
            </details>
        </details>
<a
href="https://infra.ci.jenkins.io/job/terraform-jobs/job/azure/job/main/942/">Jenkins
pipeline link</a>
    </action>
</Actions>

---

<table>
  <tr>
    <td width="77">
<img src="https://www.updatecli.io/images/updatecli.png" alt="Updatecli
logo" width="50" height="50">
    </td>
    <td>
      <p>
Created automatically by <a
href="https://www.updatecli.io/">Updatecli</a>
      </p>
      <details><summary>Options:</summary>
        <br />
<p>Most of Updatecli configuration is done via <a
href="https://www.updatecli.io/docs/prologue/quick-start/">its
manifest(s)</a>.</p>
        <ul>
<li>If you close this pull request, Updatecli will automatically reopen
it, the next time it runs.</li>
<li>If you close this pull request and delete the base branch, Updatecli
will automatically recreate it, erasing all previous commits made.</li>
        </ul>
        <p>
Feel free to report any issues at <a
href="https://github.com/updatecli/updatecli/issues">github.com/updatecli/updatecli</a>.<br
/>
If you find this tool useful, do not hesitate to star <a
href="https://github.com/updatecli/updatecli/stargazers">our GitHub
repository</a> as a sign of appreciation, and/or to tell us directly on
our <a
href="https://matrix.to/#/#Updatecli_community:gitter.im">chat</a>!
        </p>
      </details>
    </td>
  </tr>
</table>

Co-authored-by: Jenkins Infra Bot (updatecli) <60776566+jenkins-infra-bot@users.noreply.github.com>
@sinbai sinbai deleted the dataprotection/upgrade-sdk branch March 28, 2024 02:43
Copy link

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 29, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants