Update to Subnet support for Private Link #5200
Conversation
| @@ -60,10 +60,6 @@ The following arguments are supported: | |||
|
|
|||
| * `address_prefix` - (Required) The address prefix to use for the subnet. | |||
|
|
|||
| * `enforce_private_link_service_network_policies` - (Optional) Enable or Disable network policies on the `private link service` in the subnet. Default is `false`. | |||
|
|
|||
| -> **NOTE:** Network policies like network security groups (NSG) are not supported for the private link service. In order to deploy a private link service on a given subnet, an explicit disable setting is required on that subnet(e.g. `enforce_private_link_service_network_policies` = `true`). This setting is only applicable for the private link service. For other resources in the subnet, access is controlled based on Network Security Groups (NSG) security rules definition. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
(note for anyone else passing through) this is removed since it's documented below: https://github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-azurerm/pull/5200/files#diff-cebb216a55611aafe1034f892e79a8ffR75-R81
|
Tests pass:
|
|
This has been released in version 1.40.0 of the provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading. As an example: provider "azurerm" {
version = "~> 1.40.0"
}
# ... other configuration ... |
|
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 hashibot-feedback@hashicorp.com. Thanks! |
ghost
locked and limited conversation to collaborators
Related to this comment #4701 (comment)
In addition, removed duplicate documentation on the subnet resource