-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
azurerm_cognitive_deployment
- Add support for VersionUpgradeOption
#22520
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @lonegunmanb, this change is a good start but we should write a test for this as well. It also looks like the API defaults this value to OnceNewDefaultVersionAvailable
so we'll want to account for that as well
Roger that, will do |
Hi @mbfrahry I have to change the model used in e2e test since the original model is deprecated now. Would you please give this pr a review? Thanks! |
@lonegunmanb Thanks for updating the tests. It looks like the model got reverted to the older one when |
Whoops... My bad, I must mess it up when I tried to merge the code, thanks for pointing out. |
… version they like
Hi @manicminer @mbfrahry I've rebased the pr to the latest main branch, and I've upgraded the model version in the e2e test so all acc tests could pass on my side. Would you please give this r another review? Thanks! |
Thanks @lonegunmanb. I'm getting a test failure with a 400 response. |
I'll see what I can do to solve this testing issue. |
Hi @manicminer I've tried to switch the region but still got no luck. I've checked the team city's history, the same errors occurred before on the main branch. The tests got the green light on our testing subscription:
Could we approve this pr for now? Or maybe we need to open a support ticket on your side I guess? Anyway, thanks for reading, waiting for your further instructions. |
@lonegunmanb We need to be able to test this. It looks like we'll have to submit an application for access to the service |
Hello @manicminer , Is there any timeline for when this can be verified and merged? We are currently blocked with this. As there is no way for us to upgrade to a new version. Is there any way we can help ? Thanks! |
@manicminer is there any way we could help with testing? |
Hello @mbfrahry, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM ⚙️
<Actions> <action id="f410411e63aff4bb73a81c2aec1d373cf8a903e63b30dee2006b0030d8a94cc8"> <h3>Bump Terraform `azurerm` provider version</h3> <details id="1d9343c012f5434ac9fe8a98135bae3667b399259be16d9b14302ea3bd424a24"> <summary>Update Terraform lock file</summary> <p>"hashicorp/azurerm" updated from "3.79.0" to "3.80.0" in file ".terraform.lock.hcl"</p> <details> <summary>3.80.0</summary> <pre>Changelog retrieved from:
	https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/releases/tag/v3.80.0
ENHANCEMENTS:

* `internal/sdk` - Added support for pointer Types in resource models ([#23810](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23810 dependencies: updating to `v0.63.0` of `github.com/hashicorp/go-azure-helpers` ([#23785](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23785 dependencies: updating to `v0.20231106.1151347` of `github.com/hashicorp/go-azure-sdk` ([#23787](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23787 `azurerm_cognitive_deployment` - support for the `version_upgrade_option` property ([#22520](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#22520 `azurerm_firewall_policy_rule_collection_group` - add support for the property `http_headers` ([#23641](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23641 `azurerm_kubernetes_cluster` - `fips_enabled` can be updated in the `default_node_pool` without recreating the cluster ([#23612](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23612 `azurerm_kusto_cluster` - the cluster `name` can now include dashes ([#23790](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23790 `azurerm_postgresql_database` - update the validation of `collation` to include support for `French_France.1252` ([#23783](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23783))

BUG FIXES:

* Data Source: `azurerm_data_protection_backup_vault` - removing `import` support, since Data Sources don't support being imported ([#23820](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23820 Data Source: `azurerm_kusto_database` - removing `import` support, since Data Sources don't support being imported ([#23820](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23820 Data Source: `azurerm_virtual_hub_route_table` - removing `import` support, since Data Sources don't support being imported ([#23820](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23820))


</pre> </details> </details> </action> </Actions> --- <table> <tr> <td width="77"> <img src="https://www.updatecli.io/images/updatecli.png" alt="Updatecli logo" width="50" height="50"> </td> <td> <p> Created automatically by <a href="https://www.updatecli.io/">Updatecli</a> </p> <details><summary>Options:</summary> <br /> <p>Most of Updatecli configuration is done via <a href="https://www.updatecli.io/docs/prologue/quick-start/">its manifest(s)</a>.</p> <ul> <li>If you close this pull request, Updatecli will automatically reopen it, the next time it runs.</li> <li>If you close this pull request and delete the base branch, Updatecli will automatically recreate it, erasing all previous commits made.</li> </ul> <p> Feel free to report any issues at <a href="https://github.com/updatecli/updatecli/issues">github.com/updatecli/updatecli</a>.<br /> If you find this tool useful, do not hesitate to star <a href="https://github.com/updatecli/updatecli/stargazers">our GitHub repository</a> as a sign of appreciation, and/or to tell us directly on our <a href="https://matrix.to/#/#Updatecli_community:gitter.im">chat</a>! </p> </details> </td> </tr> </table> Co-authored-by: Jenkins Infra Bot (updatecli) <60776566+jenkins-infra-bot@users.noreply.github.com>
Hey @mbfrahry May I know from where this default is defined? From the doc
I can raise a PR for a quick fix. Do let me know thoughts @katbyte |
I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions. |
Add support for VersionUpgradeOption so the users can set the model's version they like. This pr should fix #22501 .