Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove version/release_trian conflict from arc_kuberenetes_cluster_extension_resource #23692

Merged

Conversation

agreaves-ms
Copy link
Contributor

This PR addresses issue #23690.

  • Removed the conflict between version and release_train.

I executed the acceptance tests that relate to arc_kubernetes_cluster_extension_resource.go and verified that they all pass. Since this is an edge case where a version and a release train could potentially be removed for an extension in the future, I did not add an acceptance test to avoid a future broken test case.

Copy link
Member

@stephybun stephybun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this PR @agreaves-ms.

I'm not sure I understand the reasoning for not adding an acceptance test for this change, but currently none of the existing tests for this resource set both release_train and version. To validate that the API accepts us sending a value for both properties simultaneously could you please add a value for release_train to the complete config in the tests?

@agreaves-ms
Copy link
Contributor Author

agreaves-ms commented Oct 26, 2023

@stephybun I've updated the test accordingly and verified that they pass without issue.

Copy link
Member

@stephybun stephybun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @agreaves-ms LGTM 🦀

@stephybun stephybun merged commit cc7e9fe into hashicorp:main Oct 27, 2023
21 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v3.79.0 milestone Oct 27, 2023
stephybun added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 27, 2023
dduportal pushed a commit to jenkins-infra/azure that referenced this pull request Nov 6, 2023
<Actions>
<action
id="f410411e63aff4bb73a81c2aec1d373cf8a903e63b30dee2006b0030d8a94cc8">
        <h3>Bump Terraform `azurerm` provider version</h3>
<details
id="1d9343c012f5434ac9fe8a98135bae3667b399259be16d9b14302ea3bd424a24">
            <summary>Update Terraform lock file</summary>
<p>&#34;hashicorp/azurerm&#34; updated from &#34;3.77.0&#34; to
&#34;3.79.0&#34; in file &#34;.terraform.lock.hcl&#34;</p>
            <details>
                <summary>3.79.0</summary>
<pre>Changelog retrieved
from:&#xA;&#x9;https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/releases/tag/v3.79.0&#xA;ENHANCEMENTS:&#xA;&#xA;*
provider: log instead of error when RPs are unavailable when validating
RP registrations
([#23380](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23380
`azurerm_arc_kuberenetes_cluster_extension_resource` - the `version` and
`release_train` properties can now be set simultaneously
([#23692](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23692
`azurerm_container_apps` - support for the `ingress.exposed_port`
property
([#23752](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23752
`azurerm_cosmosdb_postgresql_cluster` - read replica clusters can be
created without specifying `administrator_login_password` property
([#23750](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23750
`azurerm_managed_application` - arrays can be supplied in the
`parameter_values` property
([#23754](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23754
`azurerm_storage_management_policy` - support for properties
`rule.*.actions.*.base_blob.0.tier_to_cold_after_days_since_{modification|last_access_time|creation}_greater_than
and
rule.*.actions.*.{snapshot|version}.0.tier_to_cold_after_days_since_creation_greater_than`
([#23574](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23574))&#xA;&#xA;BUG
FIXES:&#xA;&#xA;* `azurerm_api_management_diagnostic` - the
`operation_name_format` attribute will only be sent if `identifier` is
set to `applicationinsights`
([#23736](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23736
`azurerm_backup_policy_vm` - fix payload by using current datetime
([#23586](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23586
`azurerm_kubernetes_cluster` - the `custom_ca_trust_certificates_base64`
property can not be removed, only updated
([#23737](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23737))&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;</pre>
            </details>
        </details>
    </action>
</Actions>

---

<table>
  <tr>
    <td width="77">
<img src="https://www.updatecli.io/images/updatecli.png" alt="Updatecli
logo" width="50" height="50">
    </td>
    <td>
      <p>
Created automatically by <a
href="https://www.updatecli.io/">Updatecli</a>
      </p>
      <details><summary>Options:</summary>
        <br />
<p>Most of Updatecli configuration is done via <a
href="https://www.updatecli.io/docs/prologue/quick-start/">its
manifest(s)</a>.</p>
        <ul>
<li>If you close this pull request, Updatecli will automatically reopen
it, the next time it runs.</li>
<li>If you close this pull request and delete the base branch, Updatecli
will automatically recreate it, erasing all previous commits made.</li>
        </ul>
        <p>
Feel free to report any issues at <a
href="https://github.com/updatecli/updatecli/issues">github.com/updatecli/updatecli</a>.<br
/>
If you find this tool useful, do not hesitate to star <a
href="https://github.com/updatecli/updatecli/stargazers">our GitHub
repository</a> as a sign of appreciation, and/or to tell us directly on
our <a
href="https://matrix.to/#/#Updatecli_community:gitter.im">chat</a>!
        </p>
      </details>
    </td>
  </tr>
</table>

Co-authored-by: Jenkins Infra Bot (updatecli) <60776566+jenkins-infra-bot@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 10, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants