-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New Resource: azurerm_workloads_sap_discovery_virtual_instance
#24342
New Resource: azurerm_workloads_sap_discovery_virtual_instance
#24342
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @neil-yechenwei
Thanks for this PR - I've taken a look through and left some comments inline. If we can fix those up, this should be good to go 👍
Thanks!
internal/services/workloads/validate/sap_virtual_instance_name.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
internal/services/workloads/workloads_sap_discovery_virtual_instance_resource.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
internal/services/workloads/workloads_sap_discovery_virtual_instance_resource.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
internal/services/workloads/workloads_sap_discovery_virtual_instance_resource.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
internal/services/workloads/workloads_sap_discovery_virtual_instance_resource.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
internal/services/workloads/workloads_sap_discovery_virtual_instance_resource_test.go
Show resolved
Hide resolved
website/docs/r/workloads_sap_discovery_virtual_instance.html.markdown
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
website/docs/r/workloads_sap_discovery_virtual_instance.html.markdown
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
website/docs/r/workloads_sap_discovery_virtual_instance.html.markdown
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
website/docs/r/workloads_sap_discovery_virtual_instance.html.markdown
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
@ms-zhenhua , thanks for the comments. I updated PR. Please take another look. Thanks. |
@neil-yechenwei thank you for your updates. LGTM~ |
hey @neil-yechenwei We’ve made some structural changes to
We’ve updated the Provider to use the new Go Module structure in PR #24636 - as such would you mind rebasing this Pull Request on top of Thanks! |
I updated PR for the SDK change. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @neil-yechenwei - I have left one minor comment and query on this, but otherwise this is looking good!
Also, can you confirm the tests are still passing after the previous changes? Thanks!
|
||
* `type` - (Required) The type of Managed Service Identity that should be configured on this SAP Discovery Virtual Instance. Only possible value is `UserAssigned`. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
* `type` - (Required) The type of Managed Service Identity that should be configured on this SAP Discovery Virtual Instance. Only possible value is `UserAssigned`. | |
* `type` - (Required) The type of Managed Service Identity that should be configured on this SAP Discovery Virtual Instance. The only possible value is `UserAssigned`. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Updated
internal/services/workloads/workloads_sap_discovery_virtual_instance_resource_test.go
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There is a regression issue on the service side and service team intends to fix it this month. So I will paste test result here once this issue is fixed. |
@catriona-m , I just now reran the related test cases and they all passed. Below is the latest test result. Thanks. --- PASS: TestAccWorkloadsSAPDiscoveryVirtualInstanceSequential/sapVirtualInstance/basic (895.12s) |
@catriona-m , Is this PR good to be merged? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @neil-yechenwei - I spotted a couple of rg test names that could be updated, but once those are fixed this should be good to go 👍. Thanks!
location = azurerm_resource_group.test.location | ||
environment = "NonProd" | ||
sap_product = "S4HANA" | ||
managed_resource_group_name = "managedTestRG%d" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
managed_resource_group_name = "managedTestRG%d" | |
managed_resource_group_name = "acctestmanagedRG%d" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Updated
location = azurerm_resource_group.test.location | ||
environment = "NonProd" | ||
sap_product = "S4HANA" | ||
managed_resource_group_name = "managedTestRG%d" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
managed_resource_group_name = "managedTestRG%d" | |
managed_resource_group_name = "acctestmanagedRG%d" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Updated
@catriona-m , thanks for the comment. I updated PR and reran the related test cases. Below is the test result. --- PASS: TestAccWorkloadsSAPDiscoveryVirtualInstanceSequential/sapVirtualInstance/update (1388.07s) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @neil-yechenwei LGTM!
<Actions> <action id="f410411e63aff4bb73a81c2aec1d373cf8a903e63b30dee2006b0030d8a94cc8"> <h3>Bump Terraform `azurerm` provider version</h3> <details id="1d9343c012f5434ac9fe8a98135bae3667b399259be16d9b14302ea3bd424a24"> <summary>Update Terraform lock file</summary> <p>changes detected:
	"hashicorp/azurerm" updated from "3.97.1" to "3.98.0" in file ".terraform.lock.hcl"</p> <details> <summary>3.98.0</summary> <pre>Changelog retrieved from:
	https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/releases/tag/v3.98.0
FEATURES:

* New Resource: `azurerm_static_web_app_function_app_registration` ([#25331](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25331 New Resource: `azurerm_system_center_virtual_machine_manager_inventory_items` ([#25110](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25110 New Resource: `azurerm_workloads_sap_discovery_virtual_instance` ([#24342](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24342 New Resource: `azurerm_redis_cache_policy` ([#25477](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25477 New Resource: `azurerm_redis_cache_policy_assignment` ([#25477](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/25477))

ENHANCEMENTS:

* dependencies: updating to `v0.20240402.1085733` of `github.com/hashicorp/go-azure-sdk` ([#25482](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25482 dependencies: updating to `v0.67.0` of `github.com/hashicorp/go-azure-helpers` ([#25446](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25446 dependencies: updating to `v0.25.4` of `github.com/tombuildsstuff/giovanni` ([#25404](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25404 `alertsmanagement` - updating remaining resources to use `hashicorp/go-azure-sdk` ([#25486](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25486 `applicationinsights` - updating remaining resources to use `hashicorp/go-azure-sdk` ([#25376](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25376 `compute` - update to API version `2024-03-01` ([#25436](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25436 `compute` - update shared image resources and data sources to use `hashicorp/go-azure-sdk` ([#25503](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25503 `containerinstance` - update to use the transport layer from `hashicorp/go-azure-sdk` rather than `Azure/go-autorest` ([#25416](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25416 `maintenance` - updating to API Version `2023-04-01` ([#25388](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25388 `recovery_services` - Add `recovery_service` block to the provider that supports `vm_backup_stop_protection_and_retain_data_on_destroy` and `purge_protected_items_from_vault_on_destroy`([#25515](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25515 `storage` - the Storage Account cache is now populated using `hashicorp/go-azure-sdk` ([#25437](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25437 `azurerm_bot_service_azure_bot` - support for the `cmk_key_vault_key_url` property ([#23640](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23640 `azurerm_capacity_reservation` - update validation for `capacity` ([#25471](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25471 `azurerm_container_app` - add support for `key_vault_id` and `identity` properties in the `secret` block ([#24773](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24773 `azurerm_databricks_workspace` - expose `managed_services_cmk_key_vault_id` and `managed_disk_cmk_key_vault_id and key_vault_id` to support cross subscription CMK's. ([#25091](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25091 `azurerm_databricks_workspace_root_dbfs_customer_managed_key` - expose `key_vault_id` to support cross subscription CMK's. ([#25091](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25091 `azurerm_managed_hsm_role_*_ids` - use specific resource id to replace generic nested item id ([#25323](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25323 `azurerm_mssql_database` - add support for `secondary_type` ([#25360](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25360 `azurerm_monitor_scheduled_query_rules_alert_v2` - support for the `identity` block ([#25365](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25365 `azurerm_mssql_server_extended_auditing_policy` - support for `audit_actions_and_groups` and `predicate_expression` ([#25425](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25425 `azurerm_netapp_account` - can now be imported ([#25384](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25384 `azurerm_netapp_volume` - support for the `kerberos_enabled`, `smb_continuous_availability_enabled`, `kerberos_5_read_only_enabled`, `kerberos_5_read_write_enabled`, `kerberos_5i_read_only_enabled`, `kerberos_5i_read_write_enabled`, `kerberos_5p_read_only_enabled`, and `kerberos_5p_read_write_enabled` properties ([#25385](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25385 `azurerm_recovery_services_vault` - upgrading to version `2024-01-01` ([#25325](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25325 `azurerm_stack_hci_cluster` - the `client_id` property is now optional ([#25407](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25407 `azurerm_storage_encryption_scope` - refactoring to use `hashicorp/go-azure-sdk` rather than `Azure/azure-sdk-for-go` ([#25437](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25437 `azurerm_mssql_elasticpool` - the `maintenance_configuration_name` property now supports values `SQL_SouthAfricaNorth_DB_1`, `SQL_SouthAfricaNorth_DB_2`, `SQL_WestUS3_DB_1` and `SQL_WestUS3_DB_2` ([#25500](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25500 `azurerm_lighthouse_assignment` - updating API Version from `2019-06-01` to `2022-10-01` ([#25473](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/25473))

BUG FIXES:

* `network` - updating the `GatewaySubnet` validation to show the Subnet Name when the validation fails ([#25484](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25484 `azurerm_function_app_hybrid_connection` - fix an issue during creation when `send_key_name` is specified ([#25379](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25379 `azurerm_linux_web_app_slot` - fix a crash when upgrading the provider to v3.88.0 or later ([#25406](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25406 `azurerm_mssql_database` - update the behavior of the `enclave_type` field. ([#25508](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25508 `azurerm_mssql_elasticpool` - update the behavior of the `enclave_type` field. ([#25508](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25508 `azurerm_network_manager_deployment` - add locking ([#25368](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25368 `azurerm_resource_group_template_deployment` - changes to `parameters_content` and `template_content` now force `output_content` to be updated in the plan ([#25403](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25403 `azurerm_storage_blob` - fix a potential crash when the endpoint is unreachable ([#25404](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25404 `azurerm_storage_container` - fix a potential crash when the endpoint is unreachable ([#25404](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25404 `azurerm_storage_data_lake_gen2_filesystem` - fix a potential crash when the endpoint is unreachable ([#25404](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25404 `azurerm_storage_data_lake_gen2_filesystem_path` - fix a potential crash when the endpoint is unreachable ([#25404](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25404 `azurerm_storage_queue` - fix a potential crash when the endpoint is unreachable ([#25404](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25404 `azurerm_storage_share` - fix a potential crash when the endpoint is unreachable ([#25404](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25404 `azurerm_storage_share_directory` - fix a potential crash when the endpoint is unreachable ([#25404](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25404 `azurerm_storage_share_directory` - resolve an issue where directories might fail to destroy ([#25404](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25404 `azurerm_storage_share_file` - fix a potential crash when the endpoint is unreachable ([#25404](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25404 `azurerm_storage_share_file` - fix several bugs with path handling when creating files in subdirectories ([#25404](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25404 `azurerm_web_app_hybrid_connection` - fix an issue during creation when `send_key_name` is specified ([#25379](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25379 `azurerm_windows_web_app` - prevent a panic during resource upgrade ([#25509](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/25509))


</pre> </details> </details> <a href="https://infra.ci.jenkins.io/job/updatecli/job/azure/job/main/88/">Jenkins pipeline link</a> </action> </Actions> --- <table> <tr> <td width="77"> <img src="https://www.updatecli.io/images/updatecli.png" alt="Updatecli logo" width="50" height="50"> </td> <td> <p> Created automatically by <a href="https://www.updatecli.io/">Updatecli</a> </p> <details><summary>Options:</summary> <br /> <p>Most of Updatecli configuration is done via <a href="https://www.updatecli.io/docs/prologue/quick-start/">its manifest(s)</a>.</p> <ul> <li>If you close this pull request, Updatecli will automatically reopen it, the next time it runs.</li> <li>If you close this pull request and delete the base branch, Updatecli will automatically recreate it, erasing all previous commits made.</li> </ul> <p> Feel free to report any issues at <a href="https://github.com/updatecli/updatecli/issues">github.com/updatecli/updatecli</a>.<br /> If you find this tool useful, do not hesitate to star <a href="https://github.com/updatecli/updatecli/stargazers">our GitHub repository</a> as a sign of appreciation, and/or to tell us directly on our <a href="https://matrix.to/#/#Updatecli_community:gitter.im">chat</a>! </p> </details> </td> </tr> </table> Co-authored-by: Jenkins Infra Bot (updatecli) <60776566+jenkins-infra-bot@users.noreply.github.com>
I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions. |
Per #22869 (comment), I split the SAP Virtual Instance per the configuration type. See more details from #22869 (comment).
--- PASS: TestAccWorkloadsSAPDiscoveryVirtualInstanceSequential/sapVirtualInstance/requiresImport (939.89s)
--- PASS: TestAccWorkloadsSAPDiscoveryVirtualInstanceSequential/sapVirtualInstance/complete (699.58s)
--- PASS: TestAccWorkloadsSAPDiscoveryVirtualInstanceSequential/sapVirtualInstance/update (731.28s)
--- PASS: TestAccWorkloadsSAPDiscoveryVirtualInstanceSequential/sapVirtualInstance/basic (699.47s)
Note: Before using this resource, it's required to submit the request of registering the Resource Provider with Azure CLI az provider register --namespace "Microsoft.Workloads". The Resource Provider can take a while to register, you can check the status by running az provider show --namespace "Microsoft.Workloads" --query "registrationState". Once this outputs "Registered" the Resource Provider is available for use. I also added this note in the resource doc.
References:
Azure doc
REST API specs