Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

newrelic - upgrade API version to 2024-03-01 #27135

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Oct 24, 2024

Conversation

teowa
Copy link
Contributor

@teowa teowa commented Aug 22, 2024

Community Note

  • Please vote on this PR by adding a 👍 reaction to the original PR to help the community and maintainers prioritize for review
  • Please do not leave comments along the lines of "+1", "me too" or "any updates", they generate extra noise for PR followers and do not help prioritize for review

Description

PR Checklist

  • I have followed the guidelines in our Contributing Documentation.
  • I have checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same update/change.
  • I have checked if my changes close any open issues. If so please include appropriate closing keywords below.
  • I have updated/added Documentation as required written in a helpful and kind way to assist users that may be unfamiliar with the resource / data source.
  • I have used a meaningful PR title to help maintainers and other users understand this change and help prevent duplicate work.
    For example: “resource_name_here - description of change e.g. adding property new_property_name_here

Changes to existing Resource / Data Source

  • I have added an explanation of what my changes do and why I'd like you to include them (This may be covered by linking to an issue above, but may benefit from additional explanation).
  • I have written new tests for my resource or datasource changes & updated any relevent documentation.
  • I have successfully run tests with my changes locally. If not, please provide details on testing challenges that prevented you running the tests.
  • (For changes that include a state migration only). I have manually tested the migration path between relevant versions of the provider.

Testing

  • My submission includes Test coverage as described in the Contribution Guide and the tests pass. (if this is not possible for any reason, please include details of why you did or could not add test coverage)

Change Log

Below please provide what should go into the changelog (if anything) conforming to the Changelog Format documented here.

  • newrelic - upgrade API version to 2024-03-01

This is a (please select all that apply):

  • Bug Fix
  • New Feature (ie adding a service, resource, or data source)
  • Enhancement
  • Breaking Change

Related Issue(s)

Fixes #0000

Note

If this PR changes meaningfully during the course of review please update the title and description as required.

@teowa
Copy link
Contributor Author

teowa commented Aug 22, 2024

image

Comment on lines +108 to +112
Default: "MONTHLY",
ValidateFunc: validation.StringInSlice([]string{
string(monitors.BillingCycleMONTHLY),
string(monitors.BillingCycleWEEKLY),
string(monitors.BillingCycleYEARLY),
"MONTHLY",
"WEEKLY",
"YEARLY",
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is there a reason these are no longer constants? could we open an issue on the rest specs asking and link it here ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @katbyte , from service team, earlier there was limit on values that this field can have, now that limitation has lifted. There will be new values in the future.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure why that means there is no longer an enum/defined in the rest API specs? i cannot see any reason why these values shouldn't be captures there. could we place open an issue on the rest specs + link it here?

@teowa
Copy link
Contributor Author

teowa commented Sep 13, 2024

Why the Enum is changed to string type in new API version:

From service team, earlier there was limit on values that this field can have, now that limitation has lifted. There will be new values in the future.

@katbyte
Copy link
Collaborator

katbyte commented Sep 24, 2024

we have test failures:

------- Stdout: -------
=== RUN   TestAccNewRelicTagRule_complete
=== PAUSE TestAccNewRelicTagRule_complete
=== CONT  TestAccNewRelicTagRule_complete
    testcase.go:173: Step 1/3 error: Error running apply: exit status 1
        
        Error: creating Monitor (Subscription: "*******"
        Resource Group Name: "acctest-rg-240924155651927473"
        Monitor Name: "acctest-nrm-240924155651927473"): performing CreateOrUpdate: unexpected status 400 (400 Bad Request) with error: BadRequest: Validation Failed: Managed Identity URI not found
        
          with azurerm_new_relic_monitor.test,
          on terraform_plugin_test.tf line 36, in resource "azurerm_new_relic_monitor" "test":
          36: resource "azurerm_new_relic_monitor" "test" {
        
        creating Monitor (Subscription: "*******"
        Resource Group Name: "acctest-rg-240924155651927473"
        Monitor Name: "acctest-nrm-240924155651927473"): performing CreateOrUpdate:
        unexpected status 400 (400 Bad Request) with error: BadRequest: Validation
        Failed: Managed Identity URI not found
--- FAIL: TestAccNewRelicTagRule_complete (127.37s)
FAIL

and could we open a rest API specs issue calling out the change away from an enum (i see no reason why it shouldn't be one) and link it in the code. once that is done + tests pass this should be good to merge

@teowa
Copy link
Contributor Author

teowa commented Oct 9, 2024

image

@katbyte
Copy link
Collaborator

katbyte commented Oct 17, 2024

@teowa - could we please address this last comment? #27135 (comment) and link a rest specs issue? that property should still be an enum

@teowa teowa requested a review from a team as a code owner October 18, 2024 03:58
Copy link
Collaborator

@katbyte katbyte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! LGTM now 🚜

@katbyte katbyte merged commit e71dbdf into hashicorp:main Oct 24, 2024
30 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v4.7.0 milestone Oct 24, 2024
katbyte added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2024
Copy link

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 25, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants