Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

azurerm_search_service:Update basic SKU partition count from 1 to 3 #28105

Conversation

Gnana-Bharathi-K
Copy link
Contributor

@Gnana-Bharathi-K Gnana-Bharathi-K commented Nov 25, 2024

Community Note

  • Please vote on this PR by adding a 👍 reaction to the original PR to help the community and maintainers prioritize for review
  • Please do not leave comments along the lines of "+1", "me too" or "any updates", they generate extra noise for PR followers and do not help prioritize for review

Description

PR Checklist

  • I have followed the guidelines in our Contributing Documentation.
  • I have checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same update/change.
  • I have checked if my changes close any open issues. If so please include appropriate closing keywords below.
  • I have updated/added Documentation as required written in a helpful and kind way to assist users that may be unfamiliar with the resource / data source.
  • I have used a meaningful PR title to help maintainers and other users understand this change and help prevent duplicate work.
    For example: “resource_name_here - description of change e.g. adding property new_property_name_here

Changes to existing Resource / Data Source

  • I have added an explanation of what my changes do and why I'd like you to include them (This may be covered by linking to an issue above, but may benefit from additional explanation).
  • I have written new tests for my resource or datasource changes & updated any relevent documentation.
  • I have successfully run tests with my changes locally. If not, please provide details on testing challenges that prevented you running the tests.
  • (For changes that include a state migration only). I have manually tested the migration path between relevant versions of the provider.

Testing

  • My submission includes Test coverage as described in the Contribution Guide and the tests pass. (if this is not possible for any reason, please include details of why you did or could not add test coverage)

Change Log

Below please provide what should go into the changelog (if anything) conforming to the Changelog Format documented here.

  • azurerm_resource - support for the thing1 property [GH-00000]

This is a (please select all that apply):

  • Bug Fix
  • New Feature (ie adding a service, resource, or data source)
  • Enhancement
  • Breaking Change

Related Issue(s)

Fixes #0000

Note

If this PR changes meaningfully during the course of review please update the title and description as required.

Copy link
Member

@catriona-m catriona-m left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this @Gnana-Bharathi-K - this looks good to me, but could we include a basic sku with partition count set to 3 in the tests so we can confirm this works as expected? Thanks!

@Gnana-Bharathi-K
Copy link
Contributor Author

Gnana-Bharathi-K commented Nov 25, 2024

Hi @catriona-m Thanks for reviewing I have updated the basic SKU partition count in tests to 3 from 4 kindly please review the tests. Added the conditions to check the count and error message as well to prompt if partition count greater than 3

@Gnana-Bharathi-K Gnana-Bharathi-K changed the title Update basic SKU partition count from 1 to 3 azurerm_search_service:Update basic SKU partition count from 1 to 3 Nov 26, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the bug label Nov 26, 2024
Copy link
Member

@catriona-m catriona-m left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @Gnana-Bharathi-K I've left one comment inline for you to consider. It would be good if we could also add a test with a basic sku and partition count of 3 to ensure it is working correctly. Thanks!

internal/services/search/search_service_resource_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@Gnana-Bharathi-K
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @catriona-m The Test Results for your reference
image

Please let me know if further details required

@catriona-m
Copy link
Member

Hi @catriona-m The Test Results for your reference image

Please let me know if further details required

Thanks for updating the existing test @Gnana-Bharathi-K.

Could you also add a new test using the partitionCount config using a basic sku and a partition count of 3 so that we can confirm that it is possible to create an azurerm_search_service with a basic sku and a partition count of 3.

Thank you!

@github-actions github-actions bot added size/S and removed size/XS labels Nov 26, 2024
@Gnana-Bharathi-K
Copy link
Contributor Author

Gnana-Bharathi-K commented Nov 26, 2024

Hi @catriona-m executed the test function with partition count 3 and SKU as basic, the search service successfully deployed in the azure portal.

Resource Group Name "acctestRG-search-241126180102558706"
search service name "acctestsearchservice241126180102558706"

I have added separate combined test function "TestAccSearchService_partitionCountvalidBySkuBasic" to test and let me know if we need separate test function only for deployment or combined test function.

Result when I passed basic sku with partition count 4
image

@Gnana-Bharathi-K
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @catriona-m , please let me know is there something I need to perform !

Copy link
Member

@catriona-m catriona-m left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for updating this @Gnana-Bharathi-K - it looks like there's a linting issue, could you run make fmt on this to fix it? Thanks!

@Gnana-Bharathi-K
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @catriona-m updated the format of the file search_service_resource_test.go

@github-actions github-actions bot added size/S and removed size/XL labels Dec 2, 2024
@Gnana-Bharathi-K
Copy link
Contributor Author

@catriona-m Updated the lint format with running gofmt against the file search_service_resource_test.go there was an extra line space which was resolved.

@Gnana-Bharathi-K
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think all the test cases been passed successfully, is there something we still need to review @catriona-m ?

@Gnana-Bharathi-K
Copy link
Contributor Author

@catriona-m please let me know if the there is any changes need to be done by my end thanks !

Copy link
Member

@catriona-m catriona-m left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for updating this @Gnana-Bharathi-K - LGTM!

@catriona-m catriona-m merged commit 6ba6882 into hashicorp:main Dec 4, 2024
32 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v4.13.0 milestone Dec 4, 2024
catriona-m added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2024
@Gnana-Bharathi-K
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @catriona-m thanks for updates and I guess everything went well ! Let me know if something needs to addressed thanks for the collaboration!

katbyte added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 6, 2024
* update for #28158, #28025

* Update CHANGELOG.md #28123

* Update CHANGELOG.md #28105

* Update for #28177

* Update for #28171

* Update for #28178

* Update CHANGELOG.md

---------

Co-authored-by: catriona-m <86247157+catriona-m@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: kt <kt@katbyte.me>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
2 participants