-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
azurerm_application_gateway - support for Key Vault SSL certificate ids #4366
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
16 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
3d4dba7
add key_vault_secret_id
f1f3648
add enable_soft_delete
3c7db34
Merge branch 'master' of github.com:terraform-providers/terraform-pro…
2029e6f
update changelog
961d98b
update changelog
1ad4d97
remove ForceNew tag
5034393
Merge branch 'master' into master
AlexMabry ffb3d13
git merge master
katbyte c9c7f3e
post merge pr fixup
katbyte 1d791f5
fix test tf
katbyte 6208c1b
fix tet tf
katbyte d850d98
Update website/docs/r/application_gateway.html.markdown
katbyte 0d67903
move off deprecated propety
katbyte 572f8a9
Merge remote-tracking branch 'AlexMabry/master' into master-3935
katbyte 45fe25a
make test pass
katbyte b8ff55e
Update key_vault.html.markdown
katbyte File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@katbyte i am quite sure this break the autorenew feature of the application gateway
With your validator you need to specify an exact version of the secret so the renew will not work.
You just need to point to the secret without the version.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree. The current tf code wants 3 parts : vaulturl/certificate name/hash
This adds it but app gateway never sees new versions of the cert. In order to have this it's only needs 2 part: vaulturl/certificate name.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@francescopersico since this PR's been merged, can you open a new issue to track that? Thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's already exists #6188