Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

azurerm_iothub - Support for public_network_access_enabled #8586

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Oct 2, 2020

Conversation

mbfrahry
Copy link
Member

@mbfrahry mbfrahry commented Sep 22, 2020

Fixes #8508

image

Copy link
Contributor

@tombuildsstuff tombuildsstuff left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

a couple of questions but this otherwise LGTM 👍

@@ -403,6 +403,11 @@ func resourceArmIotHub() *schema.Resource {
},
},

"public_network_access": {
Type: schema.TypeBool,
Optional: true,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

does this need to default to enabled? it'd be good to confirm with the portal's behaviour

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If you don't specify it when creating an iothub, it doesn't get returned by the api so I don't think we can default it without breaking people.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You're required to specify it when creating it in the portal. I believe this functionality was added recently. I imagine it's on by default but the api doesn't return it if a user didn't specify it when creating.

image

if enabled == devices.Enabled {
d.Set("public_network_access", true)
}
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

couldn't we could make this:

Suggested change
}
publicNetworkAccessEnabled := properties.PublicNetworkAccess == devices.Enabled
d.Set("public_network_access", publicNetworkAccessEnabled)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure could

@mbfrahry
Copy link
Member Author

This is ready for another review @tombuildsstuff

Copy link
Collaborator

@katbyte katbyte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Aside from one comment about the property name LGTM ! 🚀

@@ -403,6 +403,11 @@ func resourceArmIotHub() *schema.Resource {
},
},

"public_network_access": {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be public_network_access_enabled ?

@mbfrahry mbfrahry changed the title azurerm_iothub - Support for public_network_access azurerm_iothub - Support for public_network_access_enabled Oct 2, 2020
@mbfrahry mbfrahry merged commit 71abd5a into master Oct 2, 2020
@mbfrahry mbfrahry deleted the u-iothub-sdk-upgrade branch October 2, 2020 19:31
mbfrahry added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2020
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Oct 8, 2020

This has been released in version 2.31.0 of the provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading. As an example:

provider "azurerm" {
    version = "~> 2.31.0"
}
# ... other configuration ...

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 2, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 hashibot-feedback@hashicorp.com. Thanks!

@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 2, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Azure IotHub provider - Allow public access to be Disable property not supported
3 participants