-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
azurerm_iothub
- Support for public_network_access_enabled
#8586
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
a couple of questions but this otherwise LGTM 👍
@@ -403,6 +403,11 @@ func resourceArmIotHub() *schema.Resource { | |||
}, | |||
}, | |||
|
|||
"public_network_access": { | |||
Type: schema.TypeBool, | |||
Optional: true, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
does this need to default to enabled? it'd be good to confirm with the portal's behaviour
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you don't specify it when creating an iothub, it doesn't get returned by the api so I don't think we can default it without breaking people.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
if enabled == devices.Enabled { | ||
d.Set("public_network_access", true) | ||
} | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
couldn't we could make this:
} | |
publicNetworkAccessEnabled := properties.PublicNetworkAccess == devices.Enabled | |
d.Set("public_network_access", publicNetworkAccessEnabled) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure could
This is ready for another review @tombuildsstuff |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Aside from one comment about the property name LGTM ! 🚀
@@ -403,6 +403,11 @@ func resourceArmIotHub() *schema.Resource { | |||
}, | |||
}, | |||
|
|||
"public_network_access": { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should this be public_network_access_enabled
?
azurerm_iothub
- Support for public_network_access
azurerm_iothub
- Support for public_network_access_enabled
This has been released in version 2.31.0 of the provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading. As an example: provider "azurerm" {
version = "~> 2.31.0"
}
# ... other configuration ... |
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 hashibot-feedback@hashicorp.com. Thanks! |
Fixes #8508