Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cloud NAT Dynamic Port Allocation #11052

Closed
marktru opened this issue Feb 8, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

Cloud NAT Dynamic Port Allocation #11052

marktru opened this issue Feb 8, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@marktru
Copy link

marktru commented Feb 8, 2022

Community Note

  • Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
  • Please do not leave "+1" or "me too" comments, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request
  • If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment. If the issue is assigned to the "modular-magician" user, it is either in the process of being autogenerated, or is planned to be autogenerated soon. If the issue is assigned to a user, that user is claiming responsibility for the issue. If the issue is assigned to "hashibot", a community member has claimed the issue already.

Description

New or Affected Resource(s)

  • google_XXXXX

Potential Terraform Configuration

# Propose what you think the configuration to take advantage of this feature should look like.
# We may not use it verbatim, but it's helpful in understanding your intent.

References

  • #0000

Internal Issue: http://b/202555827

@rileykarson rileykarson modified the milestones: Goals, Near-Term Goals Feb 14, 2022
rabun788 added a commit to rabun788/terraform-provider-google that referenced this issue Mar 3, 2022
rabun788 added a commit to rabun788/terraform-provider-google that referenced this issue Mar 3, 2022
rabun788 added a commit to rabun788/terraform-provider-google that referenced this issue Mar 3, 2022
dark added a commit to dark/magic-modules that referenced this issue Jun 21, 2022
…amicPortAllocation

Support for the Dynamic Port Allocation feature (tracked in
terraform-google-modules/terraform-google-cloud-nat#64 and
hashicorp/terraform-provider-google#11052) was initially implemented
in GoogleCloudPlatform#6022, but it lacked support for the maxPortsPerVm field. This
field is crucial to allow the full configuration to work.
melinath pushed a commit to GoogleCloudPlatform/magic-modules that referenced this issue Jun 22, 2022
…amicPortAllocation (#6155)

Support for the Dynamic Port Allocation feature (tracked in
terraform-google-modules/terraform-google-cloud-nat#64 and
hashicorp/terraform-provider-google#11052) was initially implemented
in #6022, but it lacked support for the maxPortsPerVm field. This
field is crucial to allow the full configuration to work.
modular-magician added a commit to modular-magician/terraform-provider-google-beta that referenced this issue Jun 22, 2022
…amicPortAllocation (hashicorp#6155)

Support for the Dynamic Port Allocation feature (tracked in
terraform-google-modules/terraform-google-cloud-nat#64 and
hashicorp/terraform-provider-google#11052) was initially implemented
in hashicorp#6022, but it lacked support for the maxPortsPerVm field. This
field is crucial to allow the full configuration to work.

Signed-off-by: Modular Magician <magic-modules@google.com>
modular-magician added a commit to modular-magician/terraform-provider-google that referenced this issue Jun 22, 2022
…amicPortAllocation (hashicorp#6155)

Support for the Dynamic Port Allocation feature (tracked in
terraform-google-modules/terraform-google-cloud-nat#64 and
hashicorp#11052) was initially implemented
in hashicorp#6022, but it lacked support for the maxPortsPerVm field. This
field is crucial to allow the full configuration to work.

Signed-off-by: Modular Magician <magic-modules@google.com>
modular-magician added a commit to hashicorp/terraform-provider-google-beta that referenced this issue Jun 22, 2022
…amicPortAllocation (#6155) (#4400)

Support for the Dynamic Port Allocation feature (tracked in
terraform-google-modules/terraform-google-cloud-nat#64 and
hashicorp/terraform-provider-google#11052) was initially implemented
in #6022, but it lacked support for the maxPortsPerVm field. This
field is crucial to allow the full configuration to work.

Signed-off-by: Modular Magician <magic-modules@google.com>
modular-magician added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 22, 2022
…amicPortAllocation (#6155) (#11933)

Support for the Dynamic Port Allocation feature (tracked in
terraform-google-modules/terraform-google-cloud-nat#64 and
#11052) was initially implemented
in #6022, but it lacked support for the maxPortsPerVm field. This
field is crucial to allow the full configuration to work.

Signed-off-by: Modular Magician <magic-modules@google.com>
modular-magician added a commit to modular-magician/terraform-validator that referenced this issue Jun 22, 2022
…amicPortAllocation (#6155)

Support for the Dynamic Port Allocation feature (tracked in
terraform-google-modules/terraform-google-cloud-nat#64 and
hashicorp/terraform-provider-google#11052) was initially implemented
in #6022, but it lacked support for the maxPortsPerVm field. This
field is crucial to allow the full configuration to work.

Signed-off-by: Modular Magician <magic-modules@google.com>
modular-magician added a commit to GoogleCloudPlatform/terraform-validator that referenced this issue Jun 22, 2022
…amicPortAllocation (#6155) (#777)

Support for the Dynamic Port Allocation feature (tracked in
terraform-google-modules/terraform-google-cloud-nat#64 and
hashicorp/terraform-provider-google#11052) was initially implemented
in #6022, but it lacked support for the maxPortsPerVm field. This
field is crucial to allow the full configuration to work.

Signed-off-by: Modular Magician <magic-modules@google.com>
@melinath
Copy link
Collaborator

Resolved by GoogleCloudPlatform/magic-modules#6155

@github-actions
Copy link

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.
If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 23, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants