You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
Please do not leave "+1" or "me too" comments, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request
If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment. If the issue is assigned to the "modular-magician" user, it is either in the process of being autogenerated, or is planned to be autogenerated soon. If the issue is assigned to a user, that user is claiming responsibility for the issue. If the issue is assigned to "hashibot", a community member has claimed the issue already.
However, the ability to configure Secrets in this manner is not exposed to users via the google_secret_manager_secret resource (see how its replication.automatic field is a boolean field instead of an object field).
The request is to support this feature in google_secret_manager_secret.
Since the resource already has a replication.automatic field, perhaps one approach that maintains backwards compatibility is to introduce a new field to expose the feature (replication.automatic_replication?).
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.
If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.
Community Note
Description
The Secret Manager API allows Secrets to have automatic replication with customer-managed encryption keys (see the
replication.automatic.customerManagedEncryption
field).However, the ability to configure Secrets in this manner is not exposed to users via the
google_secret_manager_secret
resource (see how itsreplication.automatic
field is a boolean field instead of an object field).The request is to support this feature in
google_secret_manager_secret
.Since the resource already has a
replication.automatic
field, perhaps one approach that maintains backwards compatibility is to introduce a new field to expose the feature (replication.automatic_replication
?).New or Affected Resource(s)
google_secret_manager_secret
Potential Terraform Configuration
References
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: