Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding ServiceConnectionPolicies resource in NetworkConnectivity. #15381

Conversation

modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Adding two new resources in TPG.
Service Connection Policy requires a Service Class
https://cloud.google.com/vpc/docs/about-service-connection-policies

We can find information about the resources in the explorer file
https://cloud.google.com/network-connectivity/docs/reference/networkconnectivity/rest

This PR solves: #15051

If this PR is for Terraform, I acknowledge that I have:

  • Searched through the issue tracker for an open issue that this either resolves or contributes to, commented on it to claim it, and written "fixes {url}" or "part of {url}" in this PR description. If there were no relevant open issues, I opened one and commented that I would like to work on it (not necessary for very small changes).
  • Ensured that all new fields I added that can be set by a user appear in at least one example (for generated resources) or third_party test (for handwritten resources or update tests).
  • Generated Terraform providers, and ran make test and make lint in the generated providers to ensure it passes unit and linter tests.
  • Ran relevant acceptance tests using my own Google Cloud project and credentials (If the acceptance tests do not yet pass or you are unable to run them, please let your reviewer know).
  • Read Write release notes before writing my release note below.

Release Note Template for Downstream PRs (will be copied)

google_network_connectivity_service_connection_policy

Derived from GoogleCloudPlatform/magic-modules#8273

…shicorp#8273)

* adding both resources, basic test for serviceClass it's working, need to fix the test scenario for policy

* fix the test scenario and the service class resource properties

* adding a testing update, just adding the labels for the resource

* added the resource service connection map, and it's basic test, need to evaluate

* Revert "added the resource service connection map, and it's basic test, need to evaluate"

This reverts commit 4240e1d81e5901221cee1f1db7c03c8fbc58e3a6.

* removing the service class in one test scenario and using a static value

* fix a typo

* removing serviceClass and fix the tests

* removing ga tag and updatinga etag for fingerprint type

* updating the code, to remove the static value from the docs, need to test

* adding a file to tpgtools override at product level

* adding function to help with env var, but the patch on tests it's failing

* adding the variable to be used in the docs

* fixing the test, the network field cannot be immutable

* removing the env_var service class and adding a static value

* updating the value used from tests and documentation

* removing unused resources for docs and tests

* fix typos, not used variables and run the fmt

* adding description to the basic test

* fixed yaml variable override

* removing unused resources for tests, and making the test fails with network as immutable

* adding encoder to help network field be immutable and be sent on patch method

Signed-off-by: Modular Magician <magic-modules@google.com>
@modular-magician modular-magician merged commit d91a1eb into hashicorp:main Aug 2, 2023
4 checks passed
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 2, 2023

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 2, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant