You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
this change is not atomic and exposes a window during which a DNS record disappears.
this makes it unusable for anything besides create/destroy.
GCP API support for this exists:
// Change: An atomic update to a collection of ResourceRecordSets.typeChangestruct {
// Additions: Which ResourceRecordSets to add?Additions []*ResourceRecordSet`json:"additions,omitempty"`// Deletions: Which ResourceRecordSets to remove? Must match existing// data exactly.Deletions []*ResourceRecordSet`json:"deletions,omitempty"`
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.
If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.
ghost
locked and limited conversation to collaborators
Apr 23, 2020
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
changes that are possible to make atomic cause recreation of a resource:
even a simple re-order causes a record to be deleted and created:
this change is not atomic and exposes a window during which a DNS record disappears.
this makes it unusable for anything besides create/destroy.
GCP API support for this exists:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: