update go-cty@v1.15.0 #35501
Merged
update go-cty@v1.15.0 #35501
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
The first change mentioned in the changelog would close #15582, I think. |
apparentlymart
approved these changes
Jul 24, 2024
|
Ah, there its is! thanks! |
|
Reminder for the merging maintainer: if this is a user-visible change, please update the changelog on the appropriate release branch. |
|
I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions. |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Update go-cty to v1.15.0
function/stdlib: Theelementfunction now accepts negative indices, extending the illusion of an infinitely-long list into the negative direction too.cty: The various "transform" functions were previously incorrectly propagating marks from a parent object down to attribute values when calling the caller-provided transform functions. The marks will now no longer be propagated downwards, which is consistent with the treatment of collection and tuple elements. If your transform function needs to take into account context about marks of upstream containers then you can maintain a stack of active marks in yourTransformerimplementation, pushing inEnterand popping inExit. (#185)Closes #35424
Closes #15582