Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

provider/azurerm: write load_balanacer attributes to network_interface_card hash #9207

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 24, 2016

Conversation

pmcatominey
Copy link
Contributor

TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/azurerm -v -run TestAccAzureRMNetworkInterface -timeout 120m
=== RUN   TestAccAzureRMNetworkInterface_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMNetworkInterface_basic (197.24s)
=== RUN   TestAccAzureRMNetworkInterface_enableIPForwarding
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMNetworkInterface_enableIPForwarding (188.65s)
=== RUN   TestAccAzureRMNetworkInterface_withTags
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMNetworkInterface_withTags (226.13s)
PASS
ok      github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/azurerm    612.088s

…e_card hash

TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/azurerm -v -run TestAccAzureRMNetworkInterface -timeout 120m
=== RUN   TestAccAzureRMNetworkInterface_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMNetworkInterface_basic (197.24s)
=== RUN   TestAccAzureRMNetworkInterface_enableIPForwarding
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMNetworkInterface_enableIPForwarding (188.65s)
=== RUN   TestAccAzureRMNetworkInterface_withTags
--- PASS: TestAccAzureRMNetworkInterface_withTags (226.13s)
PASS
ok  	github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/azurerm	612.088s
@pmcatominey
Copy link
Contributor Author

I noticed that this change was originally made in #6429

@stack72
Copy link
Contributor

stack72 commented Oct 4, 2016

Hi @pmcatominey

I am going to wait until after #9199 to merge this - this sort of makes little sense unless the LB is implemented. sound ok?

P.

@pmcatominey
Copy link
Contributor Author

@stack72 yep, that's fine.

@stack72
Copy link
Contributor

stack72 commented Oct 4, 2016

while you are paying attention to my comments - any thoughts on why these are failing? https://travis-ci.org/hashicorp/terraform/jobs/164835834

Potential vendor dep issue?

@pmcatominey
Copy link
Contributor Author

Looks like it, the time formatting in Azure/go-autorest was changed to fix a bug and made it into Terraform yesterday as part of #9151.

The original change landed in Azure/go-autorest#89 to fix the SDK issue (Azure/azure-sdk-for-go#402).

Seems that has introduced a regression which should be fixed as of Azure/go-autorest#91. We need Azure/azure-sdk-for-go#407 to be merged to catch this fix.

@stack72
Copy link
Contributor

stack72 commented Oct 5, 2016

@pmcatominey just a FYI, I bumped go-autorest to 7.2.1 last night and the tests are now passing again

@stack72
Copy link
Contributor

stack72 commented Oct 24, 2016

Thanks for the work here @pmcatominey - going to merge this now that LB has been merged

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 21, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 21, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants