-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Missing 1.13.3 tag in Dockerhub #21339
Comments
I guess something must have gone wrong in the publishing process, since it did get updated at https://github.com/hashicorp/docker-vault A quick workaround for now would be to take note that |
Do note that similarly to Consul we'll stopped publishing tags for 1.13.x once 1.14.0 GAs (1.13.4 in particular). It appears our PR to update the Docker mirror was blocked on an older version, we'll address that and get the 1.13.3 tag pushed. |
@cipherboy The current phrasing of the deprecation notice at https://hub.docker.com/_/vault seems to imply future 1.13.x releases and those from active older series would continue to be published until those release series go end of life. If that's not the case, and all publishing to https://hub.docker.com/_/vault has now ceased, it would be nice if the statement of deprecation could be amended for clarity. |
@maxb Yeah, this is in line with Consul's language though too:
vs
Do you have suggestions here? Maybe:
|
The issue is that the "Upcoming in Vault 1.14" language primes someone who is used to thinking of software in terms of release series / branches, to view the rest of the text as a change introduced on main, first released in the 1.14 release series. (Whilst earlier release branches remain operating via previous release engineering tooling.) Such a policy would have been most convenient for end users, as it would allow an end user currently following the 1.13.x series to continue to obtain images for future patch releases in that series, without needing to migrate to a different image flavour. (I recall someone mentioning that the A phrasing such as:
would be effective in eliminating that alternative interpretation. |
Hi!
I'm trying to pull the
1.3.3
tag from Dockerhub but it is returning the following errorIn dockerhub it appears that the tag wasn't pushed at all https://hub.docker.com/_/vault/tags?page=1&name=1.13
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: