Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add client_type field to EntityRecord protobuf #20626

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 19, 2023
Merged

Conversation

mpalmi
Copy link
Contributor

@mpalmi mpalmi commented May 17, 2023

This PR adds a new protobuf entry for ClientType. This gets properly populated in AddActivityToFragment using the activityType field (currently "entity", "non-entity-token", or "acme"). Tests to come on the enterprise side.

@cipherboy cipherboy force-pushed the cipherboy-start-billing-acme branch 2 times, most recently from c75dc21 to 0c402e5 Compare May 17, 2023 15:39
Base automatically changed from cipherboy-start-billing-acme to main May 17, 2023 16:12
@mpalmi mpalmi force-pushed the acme-entityrecord-field branch 2 times, most recently from afa6dcb to 8889e7a Compare May 19, 2023 15:25
@mpalmi
Copy link
Contributor Author

mpalmi commented May 19, 2023

Still needs a changelog entry and tests (on enterprise) to validate the ClientType field in EntityRecords.

@mpalmi mpalmi changed the title WIP: Acme entityrecord field Add client_type field to EntityRecord protobuf May 19, 2023
@mpalmi mpalmi marked this pull request as ready for review May 19, 2023 17:46
@mpalmi mpalmi added this to the 1.14 milestone May 19, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@hghaf099 hghaf099 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice!

@mpalmi mpalmi requested a review from a team May 19, 2023 20:01
@mpalmi mpalmi enabled auto-merge (squash) May 19, 2023 20:07
@mpalmi mpalmi merged commit 6d95f8c into main May 19, 2023
@mpalmi mpalmi deleted the acme-entityrecord-field branch May 19, 2023 20:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants