-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 696
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Mergify impersonates random user — do we want a determinate? #8462
Comments
You nominate me for a bot? |
Mergify impersonating random users is an excellent setup for a game of Werewolf, but not good for a busy repo as ours. I too second a fixed account, I too think Mikolaj is a good choice. |
I'm fed up with the messages the bot sends, so I submitted #8830. |
The upstream issue is Mergifyio/mergify#5069 it seems impossible to work around it because stetting account that Mergify will impersonate seems to be a premium feature now. |
That's not so bad (for a free service). Shall we close? |
I'm not sure. These messages (although, not per se the focus of this issue) are so annoying and polluting that I'm short of writing a GitHub bot that would shoot down them! If only I could program… |
The rebasing issue as reported on the Mergify bug tracker became really pressing recently: Quick summary here:
|
I described the problem on the Mergify bug tracker Mergifyio/mergify#5038
They say it's inevitable, but there's an option: instead of a random account use a fixed one (added to config as the
update_bot_account
option). Do we want a determinate one? I think it'd be less surprising to everyone if we put someone in high rank there. E.g. @Mikolaj would be my choice.Thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: