-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 696
Sandboxed Builds and Isolated Environments
Imported from Trac wiki; be wary of outdated information or markup mishaps.
This page contains various notes pertaining to the "Sandboxed Builds and Isolated Environments" GSoC 2012 project.
The project can be summarised as "integrate cabal-dev into cabal and polish the result". Specifically, we want to be able to choose a compiler version to be used in the sandbox, and run a shell with a sandbox-restricted compiler and tools. Another important concern is portability: all features must be available on both Windows and *nix. One feature that is not going to be supported is cabal-dev ghci
(depends on cabal repl
patches which are not yet merged). Additionally, compilers other than GHC are not going to be supported, at least initially.
Mechanisms described on the PackageEnvironments page form a starting point for the implementation of the internal part; ideas from Johan Tibell's "Cabal of my dreams" post influence the command-line UI design.
The infrastructure changes and the preliminary UI patches have been already merged, we need to agree on and implement the final UI. The --package-root
option is not yet implemented, and shared sandboxes should be tested a bit more. We decided not to implement cabal sandbox-shell
for now.
Because of the difficulties of merging large and invasive changes into mainline Cabal I intend to structure my work as several smaller patch sets which can be merged one-by-one, preferably during the summer period. It is also important to minimise the impact on the rest of the Cabal library initially, even if that means some code duplication. Once a working version of the code has been merged, it will be much easier to build up on that and apply refactoring & polishing changes.
At this moment, I plan to break up the project into the following stages:
Implement the extended package index format as described in Package Environments#extended-source-package-index-format. This is the foundation that the later stages build on.
Q: Do we need the cabal index
subcommand?
A: It can be useful for debugging, but should be hidden from users.
This is the "merge cabal-dev into cabal" part. The idea is to make cabal-dev
available as a cabal
subcommand. The implementation will use the extended package index and package environment file, and the UI will be modeled after cabal-dev
, but with some differences:
-
cabal sandbox build
will add all dependencies to the sandbox automatically, so there will be no need forcabal sandbox install
. Ditto forcabal sandbox bench
andcabal sandbox test
. - In addition to
add-source
, there will be alink-source
subcommand that will rebuild and re-add the linked package each time it changes. Q: Can we makelink-source
the default? - It will be possible to specify the compiler version to be used in the sandbox.
Example session:
$ cabal sandbox-init --with-compiler=/path/to/ghc
$ cabal sandbox-link-source /path/to/unreleased-package
$ cabal sandbox-configure
Configuring...
$ cabal sandbox-build
Building dependency-1...
Building dependency-2...
Building unreleased-package...
Building...
$ vim /path/to/unreleased-package/.../SomeModule.hs
$ cabal sandbox-build
Building unreleased-package...
Building...
The cabal sandbox init
subcommand will be replaced by a --sandbox
flag to --configure
; --link-source
will be also made a --configure
option. The configure
, build
, test
, bench
and install
commands will be made aware of whether there is an sandbox active.
Example session:
$ cabal configure --sandbox --with-compiler=/path/to/ghc --link-source=/path/to/dependency-1
$ cabal build
Note: building in a sandbox.
Building dependency-1...
Building dependency-2...
Building...
Once ghc-pkg
gets Nix-style package management, the --sandbox
switch will be made the default.
For large sets of dependencies, linking sources manually with --link-source
is tedious. It would be nice if configure
could be just given a path to the package directory, and then would walk the directory tree and discover the .cabal files automatically
Q: Given --package-root
, --link-source
is redundant. Should it be removed?
It would be nice to allow linking to Git/Darcs/... repositories from sandboxes. cabal build
would then update cached working copies automatically.
Allow providing an optional path argument to configure --sandbox
so that sandboxes could be shared.
This feature (inspired by virthualenv) will allow to run a shell with a sandbox-restricted compiler and tools. Important: Windows support.
Bugs/known issues/things to look at:
- The Setup.hs dependencies issue that Rogan talks about here.
- The wxdirect issue apfelmus mentions here.
- Interesting test cases: yi, xmonad (requires patches to xmonad/dyre to work with sandboxes)
-
cabal configure --sandbox
should implycabal add-source .
(?) -
cabal-meta
's functionality without sandboxing.