Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Incorrect Char array type number for portable serialization #238

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 16, 2017

Conversation

ihsandemir
Copy link
Collaborator

Corrected the Type number at FieldType class to be the same as Java. Added read/writeBooleanArray to portable reader/writer.

Fixes #230

Fixes #236

@ihsandemir ihsandemir added this to the 3.8 milestone Mar 14, 2017
@ihsandemir ihsandemir self-assigned this Mar 14, 2017
@ihsandemir ihsandemir requested a review from sancar March 14, 2017 15:26
@ihsandemir
Copy link
Collaborator Author

verify

@devOpsHazelcast
Copy link
Contributor

Test FAILed.

static const FieldType TYPE_LONG_ARRAY(15);
static const FieldType TYPE_FLOAT_ARRAY(16);
static const FieldType TYPE_DOUBLE_ARRAY(17);
static const FieldType TYPE_BOOLEAN_ARRAY(11);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

12 ?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok, corrected.

…Added read/writeBooleanArray to portable reader/writer.
@ihsandemir
Copy link
Collaborator Author

verify

…portable has enough fields to test the portable serialization between java and c++ for a wider possibility of fields.
@devOpsHazelcast
Copy link
Contributor

Test FAILed.

1 similar comment
@devOpsHazelcast
Copy link
Contributor

Test FAILed.

@devOpsHazelcast
Copy link
Contributor

Test PASSed.

@ihsandemir ihsandemir merged commit 96ffef1 into hazelcast:master Mar 16, 2017
@ihsandemir ihsandemir deleted the boolArrayTypeFix branch March 16, 2017 21:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants