Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Respect lsp definition order for code actions #9590

Merged

Conversation

estin
Copy link
Contributor

@estin estin commented Feb 10, 2024

Hi!

It's small changes to render completions/actions from lsp by they definition order on languages.toml

@poliorcetics
Copy link
Contributor

Probably needs a documentation update so people know about that behavior and can rely on it

@the-mikedavis the-mikedavis added A-language-server Area: Language server client S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from a maintainer. labels Feb 10, 2024
@pascalkuthe
Copy link
Member

I have larger changes for completion in the works that will (among many other thigns) handle multi lsp completion ordering (somewhat similarly but note quite the same).

I think the code actions changes look good so if you remove the completion changes I would be happy to merge this one.

@the-mikedavis the-mikedavis changed the title fix: respect lsp definition order, small cleanup Respect lsp definition order for code actions Apr 9, 2024
@the-mikedavis the-mikedavis merged commit 07cb24a into helix-editor:master Apr 9, 2024
6 checks passed
postsolar pushed a commit to postsolar/helix that referenced this pull request Apr 20, 2024
mtoohey31 pushed a commit to mtoohey31/helix that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2024
Vulpesx pushed a commit to Vulpesx/helix that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2024
smortime pushed a commit to smortime/helix that referenced this pull request Jul 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-language-server Area: Language server client S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from a maintainer.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants