add pr workflow #1127
Merged
add pr workflow #1127
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
|
You have successfully added a new CodeQL configuration |
|
Thank you for the PR! |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## release/1.2.x #1127 +/- ##
=================================================
- Coverage 91.80% 91.80% -0.01%
=================================================
Files 65 65
Lines 10075 10038 -37
=================================================
- Hits 9249 9215 -34
+ Misses 826 823 -3
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. see 9 files with indirect coverage changes 📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
|
Thank you for the PR! |
|
Thank you for the PR! |
ClaudiaComito
approved these changes
Apr 18, 2023
ClaudiaComito
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 23, 2023
* Support latest PyTorch release * Update setup.py * Specify allclose tolerance in test_inv() * Increase allclose tolerance in test_inv * Increase allclose tolerance for distributed floating-point operations * fix working branches selection * add pr workflow (#1127) * add pr workflow * [pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci * Update README.md * Update .gitlab-ci.yml --------- Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Support latest PyTorch release * expand version check to torch 2 * dndarray.item() to return ValueError if dndarray.size > 1 * increase min pytorch & delete old code * delete code for python < 3.7 * remove pytorch 1.7 from test matrix * call bitwise functions instead of tensor builtins * Fixed bugs due to behaviour change in torch.nn.Module.zero_grad() and torch.Tensor.item() in torch 2.0 (#1149) * Support latest PyTorch release * Fixed bug in optimizer due to change in default behaviour of zero_grad() function in torch 2.0 * Fixed bug in due to change in behaviour of torch.Tensor.item() in torch 2.0 * Fixed version in setup.py * Modified tests to work for torch 1.0 also --------- Co-authored-by: ClaudiaComito <ClaudiaComito@users.noreply.github.com> * update test_item * replace python 3.7 with 3.10 in tests * increase min python + numpy * Add Interoperability chapter * update deprecated functions * switch ref * bump pytorch version * define branch name for Pytorch release PR * Add torch 2.0.0 to matrix * Test latest torch patch, fix 1.8 entries --------- Co-authored-by: ClaudiaComito <ClaudiaComito@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Michael Tarnawa <m.tarnawa@fz-juelich.de> Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Ashwath V A <73862377+Mystic-Slice@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Adds an updated version of the workflows used in main with a minor fix.
Issue/s resolved: #1113
Changes proposed:
Type of change
Memory requirements
Performance
Due Diligence
Does this change modify the behaviour of other functions? If so, which?
no