Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(docs): Identifier 'colors' has already been declared #4276

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 8, 2024

Conversation

wingkwong
Copy link
Member

@wingkwong wingkwong commented Dec 8, 2024

Closes #

📝 Description

⛳️ Current behavior (updates)

image

🚀 New behavior

image

💣 Is this a breaking change (Yes/No):

📝 Additional Information

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Adjusted the scope of the colors variable in the App component for better encapsulation in multiple table selection components.
  • Refactor
    • Moved the colors array declaration from global scope to local scope within the App function across various table selection components.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Dec 8, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 6eaf3da

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 8, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
nextui-docs-v2 ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Dec 8, 2024 6:45am
nextui-storybook-v2 ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Dec 8, 2024 6:45am

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 8, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve modifying the scope of the colors array within the App component across three files: disallow-empty-selection.raw.jsx, multiple-selection.raw.jsx, and single-selection.raw.jsx. The colors array, which defines available color options, has been moved from a global declaration to a local declaration within the App function in each file. This adjustment does not alter the functionality or structure of the components.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
apps/docs/content/components/table/disallow-empty-selection.raw.jsx Moved colors array declaration from global scope to local scope within the App function.
apps/docs/content/components/table/multiple-selection.raw.jsx Moved colors array declaration from global scope to local scope within the App function.
apps/docs/content/components/table/single-selection.raw.jsx Moved colors array declaration from global scope to local scope within the App function.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

📋 Scope : Docs

Suggested reviewers

  • jrgarciadev

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between de046f1 and 6eaf3da.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • apps/docs/content/components/table/disallow-empty-selection.raw.jsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/docs/content/components/table/multiple-selection.raw.jsx (1 hunks)
  • apps/docs/content/components/table/single-selection.raw.jsx (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
apps/docs/content/components/table/single-selection.raw.jsx (1)

15-16: LGTM! Good improvement in variable scoping

Moving the colors array inside the App function is the right approach as it prevents naming conflicts with other components that might use the same identifier. This change maintains component isolation while preserving the functionality.

apps/docs/content/components/table/multiple-selection.raw.jsx (1)

15-16: LGTM! Consistent with other changes

Moving the colors array inside the App function maintains consistency with other components while preventing naming conflicts.

apps/docs/content/components/table/disallow-empty-selection.raw.jsx (1)

15-16: LGTM! Completes the scope improvement pattern

Moving the colors array inside the App function completes the pattern across all table selection examples. This change ensures consistent scoping and prevents naming conflicts throughout the documentation.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@jrgarciadev jrgarciadev merged commit 05d0792 into main Dec 8, 2024
3 checks passed
@jrgarciadev jrgarciadev deleted the fix/table-page branch December 8, 2024 11:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants