Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HV-1831 experiments (6.2) #1170

Closed
wants to merge 16 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

gbadner
Copy link

@gbadner gbadner commented Apr 22, 2021

https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HV-1831

Supersedes #1169, which targets the incorrect branch.

gbadner and others added 7 commits April 22, 2021 20:30
Add support for containers; add tests for List w/ and w/o duplicated values
I removed it from the traditional VF for now as I would like us to focus
on the case where it is useful first.

We will reintroduce it later once we have validated the approach where
it is the most useful.

I'm a bit unclear right now if we should use the same contract for
traditional and predefined scope VF as we are dealing with different
things and they won't be evaluated at the same moment.

I'm thinking that maybe this needs to be a different contract.
@hibernate-github-bot
Copy link

hibernate-github-bot bot commented Jul 30, 2021

Thanks for your pull request!

This pull request does not follow the contribution rules. Could you have a look?

❌ All commit messages should start with a JIRA issue key matching pattern HV-\d+
    ↳ Offending commits: [cea9b8c, f4d7656, 21d7d7b]

› This message was automatically generated.

}
final BeanMetaData<?> beanMetaData = rawBeanMetaDataMap.get( beanClass );

if ( beanMetaData == null || !beanMetaData.hasCascadables() ) {
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was wondering how to deal with beanMetaData == null. I'm glad to see that spelled out here.

@gbadner
Copy link
Author

gbadner commented Jul 30, 2021

@gsmet, I've read through your changes, and I understand why you made those changes. Looks good to me!

This contract allows to override the default bean process tracking
behavior without exposing our internal structures.

It needs a bit more love on the config side so that we can define it via
XML too and some documentation.
@jameswynn
Copy link

Has this stalled? Any chance we will see a resolution to this in a near release?

@gsmet
Copy link
Member

gsmet commented Sep 1, 2022

I recreated the PR with a branch in my fork here: #1288 .

@gsmet gsmet closed this Sep 1, 2022
@gsmet
Copy link
Member

gsmet commented Sep 1, 2022

@jameswynn I don't have much time to spend on HV lately. If someone is interested in pursuing this in the meantime, it's very welcome.

@sjaakd
Copy link

sjaakd commented Jan 29, 2024

@gsmet : we have similar issues with the current solution. I'm having troubles finding the latest status of this. Is somebody still working on this? Thanks..

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants