Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add bug label to the board #300

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 18, 2024
Merged

Conversation

georgeciubotaru
Copy link
Contributor

@georgeciubotaru georgeciubotaru commented Oct 18, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced label matching to include both "goal" and "bug" for improved issue categorization.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved handling of labeled actions for better project item management.

@georgeciubotaru georgeciubotaru self-assigned this Oct 18, 2024
Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 18, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
autoinvoice ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 18, 2024 7:06am

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 18, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve an update to the regular expression in the createJob function located in the issues.ts file. The regex now matches both "goal" and "bug" labels, expanding the criteria for label matching in the labeled action case. The overall logic of handling the IssuesLabeledEvent payload and the associated asynchronous tasks remains unchanged, and there are no alterations to exported or public entities.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/lib/server/trigger-dev/jobs/issues.ts Modified regex in createJob function to match "goal" or "bug" labels.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant IssuesLabeledEvent
    participant createJobFunction

    User->>IssuesLabeledEvent: Trigger labeled action
    IssuesLabeledEvent->>createJobFunction: Call with event payload
    createJobFunction->>createJobFunction: Match label using updated regex
    createJobFunction->>createJobFunction: Handle asynchronous tasks
    createJobFunction-->>User: Process complete
Loading

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/lib/server/trigger-dev/jobs/issues.ts (2)

87-87: LGTM! Consider a minor readability improvement.

The updated regex correctly expands the label matching to include both 'goal' and 'bug', which aligns with the PR objective. The implementation is correct and case-insensitive.

For improved readability, consider using a template literal with the RegExp constructor:

-const regexExp = new RegExp(/.*\b(goal|bug)\b/, 'i');
+const regexExp = new RegExp(String.raw`.*\b(goal|bug)\b`, 'i');

This approach allows for easier modification of the regex pattern in the future if needed.


Line range hint 1-89: Consider improvements for robustness and maintainability.

While the core functionality looks solid, there are a few areas where the code could be made more robust and maintainable:

  1. Error Handling: Consider adding explicit error handling for the GraphQL operations. This will help in debugging and ensuring graceful failure if issues arise.

  2. Configuration: The hardcoded node IDs (teamOracleNodeId and teamOracleProjectNodeId) could be moved to a configuration file or environment variables. This would make it easier to manage different environments or project changes.

  3. Logging: Consider adding more detailed logging throughout the function to aid in monitoring and debugging.

Here's an example of how you might implement these suggestions:

import config from './config'; // Assume this file contains the node IDs

// ... existing imports ...

export async function createJob<T extends IOWithIntegrations<{ github: Autoinvoicing }>>(
  payload: IssuesLabeledEvent,
  io: T,
  ctx: TriggerContext,
  org: { nodeId: string; name: string }
) {
  const { action, issue } = payload;

  io.logger.info(`Processing issue ${issue.number} with action: ${action}`);

  switch (action) {
    case 'labeled': {
      const { label } = payload;

      if (label && regexExp.test(label.name)) {
        io.logger.info(`Matched label: ${label.name}`);
        
        try {
          const projectItem = await io.github.runTask(
            `add-issue-to-the-board-${issue.id}`,
            async (octokit) => {
              // ... existing GraphQL mutation ...
            },
            { name: "Add Issue to the Oracle's Board" }
          );

          io.logger.info(`Added issue to board: ${projectItem.addProjectV2ItemById.item?.id}`);

          const updateProjectItem = await io.github.runTask(
            `update-project-fields-${issue.id}`,
            async (octokit) => {
              // ... existing GraphQL mutation ...
            },
            { name: 'Update project item' }
          );

          io.logger.info(`Updated project item: ${updateProjectItem.updateProjectV2ItemFieldValue.projectV2Item.id}`);

          return Promise.resolve(updateProjectItem);
        } catch (error) {
          io.logger.error(`Error processing issue ${issue.number}:`, error);
          throw error; // or handle as appropriate for your use case
        }
      }
    }
    default: {
      io.logger.info('Current action for issue is not a parse candidate', { action, issueNumber: issue.number });
    }
  }
}

const regexExp = new RegExp(String.raw`.*\b(goal|bug)\b`, 'i');
const { teamOracleNodeId, teamOracleProjectNodeId } = config;

This refactored version includes more logging, error handling, and assumes the use of a configuration file for the node IDs.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4590019 and 6402e83.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/lib/server/trigger-dev/jobs/issues.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/lib/server/trigger-dev/jobs/issues.ts (1)

Line range hint 22-82: Verify intended behavior and monitor impact.

The regex change will now trigger board actions for both 'goal' and 'bug' labels. This could potentially increase the number of issues added to the board.

Please confirm:

  1. Is it intended for both 'goal' and 'bug' labeled issues to be added to the same board?
  2. Are there any capacity concerns for the board with this expanded criteria?

Consider monitoring the rate of issues being added to the board after this change to ensure it aligns with expectations.

@georgeciubotaru georgeciubotaru merged commit 0ce4fb4 into main Oct 18, 2024
3 checks passed
@georgeciubotaru georgeciubotaru deleted the feat/add-bug-labels-to-board branch October 18, 2024 07:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant