-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: add bug label to the board #300
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
WalkthroughThe changes involve an update to the regular expression in the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant IssuesLabeledEvent
participant createJobFunction
User->>IssuesLabeledEvent: Trigger labeled action
IssuesLabeledEvent->>createJobFunction: Call with event payload
createJobFunction->>createJobFunction: Match label using updated regex
createJobFunction->>createJobFunction: Handle asynchronous tasks
createJobFunction-->>User: Process complete
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/lib/server/trigger-dev/jobs/issues.ts (2)
87-87
: LGTM! Consider a minor readability improvement.The updated regex correctly expands the label matching to include both 'goal' and 'bug', which aligns with the PR objective. The implementation is correct and case-insensitive.
For improved readability, consider using a template literal with the RegExp constructor:
-const regexExp = new RegExp(/.*\b(goal|bug)\b/, 'i'); +const regexExp = new RegExp(String.raw`.*\b(goal|bug)\b`, 'i');This approach allows for easier modification of the regex pattern in the future if needed.
Line range hint
1-89
: Consider improvements for robustness and maintainability.While the core functionality looks solid, there are a few areas where the code could be made more robust and maintainable:
Error Handling: Consider adding explicit error handling for the GraphQL operations. This will help in debugging and ensuring graceful failure if issues arise.
Configuration: The hardcoded node IDs (
teamOracleNodeId
andteamOracleProjectNodeId
) could be moved to a configuration file or environment variables. This would make it easier to manage different environments or project changes.Logging: Consider adding more detailed logging throughout the function to aid in monitoring and debugging.
Here's an example of how you might implement these suggestions:
import config from './config'; // Assume this file contains the node IDs // ... existing imports ... export async function createJob<T extends IOWithIntegrations<{ github: Autoinvoicing }>>( payload: IssuesLabeledEvent, io: T, ctx: TriggerContext, org: { nodeId: string; name: string } ) { const { action, issue } = payload; io.logger.info(`Processing issue ${issue.number} with action: ${action}`); switch (action) { case 'labeled': { const { label } = payload; if (label && regexExp.test(label.name)) { io.logger.info(`Matched label: ${label.name}`); try { const projectItem = await io.github.runTask( `add-issue-to-the-board-${issue.id}`, async (octokit) => { // ... existing GraphQL mutation ... }, { name: "Add Issue to the Oracle's Board" } ); io.logger.info(`Added issue to board: ${projectItem.addProjectV2ItemById.item?.id}`); const updateProjectItem = await io.github.runTask( `update-project-fields-${issue.id}`, async (octokit) => { // ... existing GraphQL mutation ... }, { name: 'Update project item' } ); io.logger.info(`Updated project item: ${updateProjectItem.updateProjectV2ItemFieldValue.projectV2Item.id}`); return Promise.resolve(updateProjectItem); } catch (error) { io.logger.error(`Error processing issue ${issue.number}:`, error); throw error; // or handle as appropriate for your use case } } } default: { io.logger.info('Current action for issue is not a parse candidate', { action, issueNumber: issue.number }); } } } const regexExp = new RegExp(String.raw`.*\b(goal|bug)\b`, 'i'); const { teamOracleNodeId, teamOracleProjectNodeId } = config;This refactored version includes more logging, error handling, and assumes the use of a configuration file for the node IDs.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- src/lib/server/trigger-dev/jobs/issues.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/lib/server/trigger-dev/jobs/issues.ts (1)
Line range hint
22-82
: Verify intended behavior and monitor impact.The regex change will now trigger board actions for both 'goal' and 'bug' labels. This could potentially increase the number of issues added to the board.
Please confirm:
- Is it intended for both 'goal' and 'bug' labeled issues to be added to the same board?
- Are there any capacity concerns for the board with this expanded criteria?
Consider monitoring the rate of issues being added to the board after this change to ensure it aligns with expectations.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes