Bump pynx584 to 0.8.2

[joostlek]

Proposed change

Bump pynx584 to 0.8.2
kk7ds/pynx584@cad0f8a...master

Type of change

• Dependency upgrade
• Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New integration (thank you!)
• New feature (which adds functionality to an existing integration)
• Deprecation (breaking change to happen in the future)
• Breaking change (fix/feature causing existing functionality to break)
• Code quality improvements to existing code or addition of tests

Additional information

• This PR fixes or closes issue: fixes #
• This PR is related to issue:
• Link to documentation pull request:

Checklist

• The code change is tested and works locally.
• Local tests pass. Your PR cannot be merged unless tests pass
• There is no commented out code in this PR.
• I have followed the development checklist
• I have followed the perfect PR recommendations
• The code has been formatted using Ruff (ruff format homeassistant tests)
• Tests have been added to verify that the new code works.

If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:

• Documentation added/updated for www.home-assistant.io

If the code communicates with devices, web services, or third-party tools:

• The manifest file has all fields filled out correctly.
  Updated and included derived files by running: python3 -m script.hassfest.
• New or updated dependencies have been added to requirements_all.txt.
  Updated by running python3 -m script.gen_requirements_all.
• For the updated dependencies - a link to the changelog, or at minimum a diff between library versions is added to the PR description.
• Untested files have been added to .coveragerc.

To help with the load of incoming pull requests:

• I have reviewed two other open pull requests in this repository.

[joostlek]

@kk7ds I assume you are still a home assistant user, are you able to test this change?

[kk7ds]

@joostlek I actually never was, I just did a bunch of integration of some of my libraries for someone else who wanted to run it (but no longer does). But yeah, I can't test this, sorry.

[joostlek]

Are there any changes we have to take into account when using this library? I wasn't expecting to bump it 3 minor versions

[kk7ds]

I think that's hard to say without me reviewing the hass code. I generally try not to break APIs when possible, but I'm pretty surprised to see that people were still running 0.5 since many of the changes since then have been at the request of hass users. Perhaps they were overriding the dep locally, I'm not sure. looks like 0.5 was kk7ds/pynx584 so you can diff and see if that looks like it would break anything. I was sure hass was using the eventqueue and such... but much of the change was to dockerfile, docs, tests.

[frenck]

Thanks, @joostlek 👍

../Frenck