Updated ecstatic version to 4.1.2 #523
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Updated esctatic version dependency as 3.0.0 is removed.
This was referenced May 3, 2019
|
Its breaking for me in azure devops npm install. I am using http-server (0.9.0) & it was pointing to ecstatic 1.4.0 Error notarget No matching version found for ecstatic@^1.4.0 Could you please help me to fix this? |
igor-h
approved these changes
May 3, 2019
|
getting a security npm warning message for this. Please merge this pull request soon. Thank you! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Updated esctatic version dependency as 3.0.0 is removed.
Please ensure that your pull request fulfills these requirements:
masterbranchWhat is the purpose of this pull request? (bug fix, enhancement, new feature,...)
What changes did you make?
Updated ecstatic version to 4.1.2
Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?
No