You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
According to their paper, the TREC dataset contains 2 kinds of classes:
6 coarse classes: TREC-6
50 fine classes: TREC-50
However, our implementation only has 47 (instead of 50) fine classes. The reason for this is that we only considered the last segment of the label, which is repeated for several coarse classes:
We have one desc fine label instead of 2:
DESC:desc
HUM:desc
We have one other fine label instead of 3:
ENTY:other
LOC:other
NUM:other
From their paper:
We define a two-layered taxonomy, which represents a natural semantic classification for typical answers in the TREC task. The hierarchy contains 6 coarse classes and 50 fine classes,
Each coarse class contains a non-overlapping set of fine classes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Describe the bug
According to their paper, the TREC dataset contains 2 kinds of classes:
However, our implementation only has 47 (instead of 50) fine classes. The reason for this is that we only considered the last segment of the label, which is repeated for several coarse classes:
desc
fine label instead of 2:DESC:desc
HUM:desc
other
fine label instead of 3:ENTY:other
LOC:other
NUM:other
From their paper:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: