-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PyArrow 13 CI fixes #6175
PyArrow 13 CI fixes #6175
Conversation
Show benchmarksPyArrow==8.0.0 Show updated benchmarks!Benchmark: benchmark_array_xd.json
Benchmark: benchmark_getitem_100B.json
Benchmark: benchmark_indices_mapping.json
Benchmark: benchmark_iterating.json
Benchmark: benchmark_map_filter.json
Show updated benchmarks!Benchmark: benchmark_array_xd.json
Benchmark: benchmark_getitem_100B.json
Benchmark: benchmark_indices_mapping.json
Benchmark: benchmark_iterating.json
Benchmark: benchmark_map_filter.json
|
The documentation is not available anymore as the PR was closed or merged. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Cool ! Just one question:
@@ -1916,7 +1916,7 @@ def _concat_arrays(arrays): | |||
_concat_arrays([array.values for array in arrays]), | |||
) | |||
elif pa.types.is_fixed_size_list(array_type): | |||
if config.PYARROW_VERSION.major < 13: | |||
if config.PYARROW_VERSION.major < 14: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we have something smarter ? like a function that tests if the pyarrow bug is still there and caches the result
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IMO this bug is too specific to run such a check.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It would be quite simple to check though no ? And it can be run only once the first time we need to check if the bug exists.
Anyway let's merge this PR ^^
Show benchmarksPyArrow==8.0.0 Show updated benchmarks!Benchmark: benchmark_array_xd.json
Benchmark: benchmark_getitem_100B.json
Benchmark: benchmark_indices_mapping.json
Benchmark: benchmark_iterating.json
Benchmark: benchmark_map_filter.json
Show updated benchmarks!Benchmark: benchmark_array_xd.json
Benchmark: benchmark_getitem_100B.json
Benchmark: benchmark_indices_mapping.json
Benchmark: benchmark_iterating.json
Benchmark: benchmark_map_filter.json
|
Fixes:
cast_array_to_feature
to avoid the offset bug (still not fixed).to_pandas(coerce_temporal_nanoseconds=True)
to always returndatetime [ns]
objects)Fix #6173