Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "Add SetFitModel.to" #234

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 14, 2022
Merged

Revert "Add SetFitModel.to" #234

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 14, 2022

Conversation

lewtun
Copy link
Member

@lewtun lewtun commented Dec 14, 2022

Reverts #229 due to failing CI on main

cc @tomaarsen

@lewtun lewtun mentioned this pull request Dec 14, 2022
@lewtun lewtun merged commit 2b3114b into main Dec 14, 2022
@lewtun lewtun deleted the revert-229-feature/add_to branch December 14, 2022 14:27
@tomaarsen
Copy link
Member

tomaarsen commented Dec 14, 2022

@lewtun

I looked into this briefly. It seems like this is an issue with the Python dependency caching that I introduced in #233, rather than an issue with #229. All of the CI runs that loaded the cache threw an error, and the few runs that had to reinstall the dependencies worked as intended.
It seems like setfit itself was included in the cache, meaning that the imports for setfit used the old version at roughly dfa4541 rather than the freshly checked-out code.

I'll look into it. To be concrete: #229 is safe and this CI issue does not negatively affect a release.

  • Tom Aarsen

tomaarsen added a commit to tomaarsen/setfit that referenced this pull request Dec 14, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants