Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify doc for readset validations #2647

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 7, 2021

Conversation

denyeart
Copy link
Contributor

@denyeart denyeart commented Jun 7, 2021

Clarify that both prior blocks and prior transactions in the same block
are considered during readset validation.

Signed-off-by: David Enyeart enyeart@us.ibm.com

Clarify that both prior blocks and prior transactions in the same block
are considered during readset validation.

Signed-off-by: David Enyeart <enyeart@us.ibm.com>
@denyeart denyeart requested review from a team as code owners June 7, 2021 15:57
@manish-sethi manish-sethi merged commit 07808a0 into hyperledger:main Jun 7, 2021
@nikhil550
Copy link
Contributor

@Mergifyio backport release-2.3

@nikhil550
Copy link
Contributor

@Mergifyio backport release-2.2

mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2021
Clarify that both prior blocks and prior transactions in the same block
are considered during readset validation.

Signed-off-by: David Enyeart <enyeart@us.ibm.com>
(cherry picked from commit 07808a0)
@mergify
Copy link

mergify bot commented Jun 7, 2021

Command backport release-2.3: success

Backports have been created

mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2021
Clarify that both prior blocks and prior transactions in the same block
are considered during readset validation.

Signed-off-by: David Enyeart <enyeart@us.ibm.com>
(cherry picked from commit 07808a0)
@mergify
Copy link

mergify bot commented Jun 7, 2021

Command backport release-2.2: success

Backports have been created

manish-sethi pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2021
Clarify that both prior blocks and prior transactions in the same block
are considered during readset validation.

Signed-off-by: David Enyeart <enyeart@us.ibm.com>
(cherry picked from commit 07808a0)

Co-authored-by: denyeart <enyeart@us.ibm.com>
manish-sethi pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2021
Clarify that both prior blocks and prior transactions in the same block
are considered during readset validation.

Signed-off-by: David Enyeart <enyeart@us.ibm.com>
(cherry picked from commit 07808a0)

Co-authored-by: denyeart <enyeart@us.ibm.com>
C0rWin pushed a commit to C0rWin/fabric that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2022
)

Clarify that both prior blocks and prior transactions in the same block
are considered during readset validation.

Signed-off-by: David Enyeart <enyeart@us.ibm.com>
(cherry picked from commit 07808a0)

Co-authored-by: denyeart <enyeart@us.ibm.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants