IBX-9103: Add RelationType for filtering purposes to fetch relations methods

[ViniTou]

🎫 Issue	IBX-9103

Related PRs: (needed for CI to pass!)

• IBX-9103: Fixed cache tag name not including relation type #437

Description:

If we decide to go with the enum I will create another PR with replacment, rector rule and changing it in our codebase.

To Discuss:

Should we also deprecate loadReverseRelations method? There already is loadReverseRelationList for substitutions and it seems as an oversight tbh.

For QA:

Documentation:

🟢 ibexa/commerce#1087

[Steveb-p]

LGTM. I assume there is no option of introducing yet another relation type, in which case an enum is warranted.

If no relation type is passed, all relations are counted, right?

[ViniTou]

@Steveb-p

I assume there is no option of introducing yet another relation type

Oh, I guess it was not documented but it wasn't so hard to do, so probably for BC point I would have to revert enum back to consts, unless you see some better option.

If no relation type is passed, all relations are counted

yup, no change here.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
1 New issue
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud