Update viz doc to clarify its current status (partial functionality - incompatible with OA API changes)

[mfisher87]

Related: #454

[review-notebook-app]

Check out this pull request on 

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.

---

Powered by ReviewNB

[github-actions]

👈 Launch a binder notebook on this branch for commit b1e9b5f

I will automatically update this comment whenever this PR is modified

👈 Launch a binder notebook on this branch for commit 632ee42

👈 Launch a binder notebook on this branch for commit 9c9e722

👈 Launch a binder notebook on this branch for commit d664b80

👈 Launch a binder notebook on this branch for commit cb195f9

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 65.98%. Comparing base (f2ad0a8) to head (cb195f9).
Report is 42 commits behind head on development.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
icepyx/core/visualization.py	0.00%	4 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##           development     #540      +/-   ##
===============================================
- Coverage        66.05%   65.98%   -0.07%     
===============================================
  Files               36       36              
  Lines             3049     3052       +3     
  Branches           537      538       +1     
===============================================
  Hits              2014     2014              
- Misses             947      950       +3     
  Partials            88       88              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[mfisher87]

Thoughts on the coverage change? The function I changed is currently not covered, but I can make it covered. I'd probably mock the response and verify a 400 raises and a 200 doesn't, but my personal feeling is there's not a ton of value there :)

[JessicaS11]

Thoughts on the coverage change? The function I changed is currently not covered, but I can make it covered. I'd probably mock the response and verify a 400 raises and a 200 doesn't, but my personal feeling is there's not a ton of value there :)

Agreed. Since #454, the broader conversation around this module is that given the lack of response to #495 and minimal complaints that this module stopped working, it may make sense to rethink how we offer any quick data visualization within icepyx.

[mfisher87]

From #454, perhaps we can fix the notebook by updating the URL. I have no idea if the API has breaking changes or not yet 😬

EDIT: It does! Moving on... :)

[JessicaS11]

I like the updates to the warning too - thanks @mfisher87!

[mfisher87]

Thanks for the review! 🪨 ⭐