Validate pyproject.toml

[cclauss]

https://github.com/tox-dev/pyproject-fmt
https://github.com/abravalheri/validate-pyproject

Also, Avoid running tests that require creds on PRs on forks by adding the changes from #563 to get CI ✅

• Avoid running tests that require creds on PRs #563

[github-actions]

👈 Launch a binder notebook on this branch for commit 3bff82d

I will automatically update this comment whenever this PR is modified

👈 Launch a binder notebook on this branch for commit 7d841c7

👈 Launch a binder notebook on this branch for commit a251605

👈 Launch a binder notebook on this branch for commit f29d03a

👈 Launch a binder notebook on this branch for commit 55b3bf8

👈 Launch a binder notebook on this branch for commit 61b1322

👈 Launch a binder notebook on this branch for commit ef7a689

👈 Launch a binder notebook on this branch for commit 1a7c456

👈 Launch a binder notebook on this branch for commit 244c6bc

[mfisher87]

This is maybe my personal preference only, but I don't like what these formatters have done. I feel the project table should be at the top, and I feel that merging the tables together is significantly less readable than previously. I've never seen a pyproject.toml written this way before, and I've seen a lot!

That said, I'm totally in favor of a validator!

[mfisher87]

🚀 LGTM!

I'd merge, but we need to figure out what's going on with Travis 😱 #558

[cclauss]

we need to figure out what's going on with Travis 😱

Let's land #559 so that we can isolate those failures.

• test_auth.py: Skip three pytests that fail on Travis CI #559

[mfisher87]

Travis failures are expected and explained by #272

Sorry for the delay, let's roll :)

[mfisher87]

Wait... shoot, I can't bypass the check, so I can't merge. I need a new permission to do that :)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 65.07%. Comparing base (8ef252c) to head (244c6bc).
Report is 37 commits behind head on development.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           development     #557   +/-   ##
============================================
  Coverage        65.07%   65.07%           
============================================
  Files               36       36           
  Lines             3052     3052           
  Branches           538      538           
============================================
  Hits              1986     1986           
  Misses             981      981           
  Partials            85       85           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[cclauss]

The changes from #563 make Travis CI pass but now Codecov is unhappy.

• Avoid running tests that require creds on PRs #563

[mfisher87]

Looks like I can bypass and merge when CodeCov is failing. Whew! But I won't merge until we have an approver on #563 -- don't want to circumvent any systems in place :)

[JessicaS11]

it would be helpful for future PRs to not include changes that are in another PR (#563)

[cclauss]

Yes but… It is quite useful when CI is already failing when the PR is created. PRs that fail are almost never reviewed and merged.

[mfisher87]

🚀 awesome idea!