Gradient Operator Dotted with Normal Vector #28566
Unanswered
TLWise
asked this question in
Q&A Modules: General
Replies: 3 comments 33 replies
-
Hello I dont know about one. I dont think this would be very difficult to implement. You should try and report on your progress and difficulties here |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
18 replies
-
Got it. I will remove one to work towards a solution. Is it possible to feed the result into a vector that stores the result? I still need to apply grad_u to rhe velocity vector?
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
15 replies
-
Thank you for taking a look at this for me. Let me know if I left something out that prevents you from running the code.
T. Leon Wise
…________________________________
From: Guillaume Giudicelli ***@***.***>
Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2024 7:48 AM
To: idaholab/moose ***@***.***>
Cc: Wise, Tammy ***@***.***>; Author ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [idaholab/moose] Gradient Operator Dotted with Normal Vector (Discussion #28566)
can you please share both input files? maybe we can spot what's wrong
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#28566 (reply in thread)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJQ6AYQGCD2SH5624PYZFJT2CHYNXAVCNFSM6AAAAABNZOWGBKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43URDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHMYTCMZWGM3TEMQ>.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
This is a different spin to a previous question to satisfy my need to code to the PDE formulation for the problem directly in MOOSE. Given the equation (I decided to derive it in PDE form) represented in the picture, is there a already defined post processor that will provide this solution?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions