Move GapPerfectConductance from BISON to MOOSE

[gambka]

Closes #28963.

I have a patch for BISON. Once approved I can merge the BISON change to remove these files so there is no conflict. No submodule update in BISON required.

[gambka]

@Naktakala FYI

[moosebuild]

Job Documentation, step Docs: sync website on 0e9f3d9 wanted to post the following:

View the site here

This comment will be updated on new commits.

[moosebuild]

Job Coverage, step Generate coverage on 0e9f3d9 wanted to post the following:

Framework coverage

Coverage did not change

Modules coverage

Heat transfer

	af6bed	#28982 0e9f3d
	Total	Total	+/-	New
Rate	88.76%	88.81%	+0.05%	97.50%
Hits	4375	4404	+29	39
Misses	554	555	+1	1

Diff coverage report

Full coverage report

Full coverage reports

Reports

• framework
• chemical_reactions
• combined
• contact
• electromagnetics
• external_petsc_solver
• fluid_properties
• fsi
• functional_expansion_tools
• geochemistry
• heat_transfer
• level_set
• misc
• navier_stokes
• optimization
• peridynamics
• phase_field
• porous_flow
• ray_tracing
• rdg
• reactor
• richards
• scalar_transport
• solid_mechanics
• solid_properties
• stochastic_tools
• thermal_hydraulics
• xfem

This comment will be updated on new commits.

[lindsayad]

thanks for moving this upstream @gambka !

[lindsayad]

my comments have been addressed

[GiudGiud]

renamed a file to avoid a doco failure

[gambka]

renamed a file to avoid a doco failure

I have a BISON patch ready and just needs to be merged that should avoid doco failures and not need any renames.

[GiudGiud]

feel free to revert if you want

[GiudGiud]

otherwise it's fine as it is

[gambka]

The BISON change was merged into devel which should fix the failure on multiple files registering GapPerfectConductance showing in the Internal App Testing. We may need to wait until it gets into master before it can be invalidated here.

[gambka]

The necessary patch to BISON has made its way into master. I think the HPC failure will be unable to overcome until Sawtooth returns to service.

[moosebuild]

Job Test HPC on 0e9f3d9 : invalidated by @lindsayad

[dschwen]

This looks like migrating technical debt from Bison to MOOSE. In the long term I'd rather fix our Contact action system to allow the use of mortar based thermal contact without mechanical contact.

[gambka]

This looks like migrating technical debt from Bison to MOOSE. In the long term I'd rather fix our Contact action system to allow the use of mortar based thermal contact without mechanical contact.

I agree with your long term goal. We also need to enable mortar contact to work on 1D simulations like the test included here that has node to node contact. What would be the reduced order mesh be used for mortar in these cases?