Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[TASK] Enabling the access to sensitivities from basicStatistics to validation algorithms in postprocesseor (i.e., representativity) #1546

Open
10 tasks
Jimmy-INL opened this issue May 10, 2021 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
priority_critical priority_minor RAVENv2.1 All tasks and defects that will go in RAVEN v2.1 task This tag should be used for any new capability, improvement or enanchment

Comments

@Jimmy-INL
Copy link
Collaborator


For some validation methods, derivative-based sensitivities are required. To initialize basic statistics at that level of the postprocessorInterface, few changes should take place in the validation gate.

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
representativity validation algorithm/postprocessor can not be implemented until the derivatives are available.

Describe the solution you'd like
Maybe instantiate the basic statistics from the rep postprocessor.

Describe alternatives you've considered
I do not have alternative suggestions but I am open to any ideas.


For Change Control Board: Issue Review

This review should occur before any development is performed as a response to this issue.

  • 1. Is it tagged with a type: defect or task?
  • 2. Is it tagged with a priority: critical, normal or minor?
  • 3. If it will impact requirements or requirements tests, is it tagged with requirements?
  • 4. If it is a defect, can it cause wrong results for users? If so an email needs to be sent to the users.
  • 5. Is a rationale provided? (Such as explaining why the improvement is needed or why current code is wrong.)

For Change Control Board: Issue Closure

This review should occur when the issue is imminently going to be closed.

  • 1. If the issue is a defect, is the defect fixed?
  • 2. If the issue is a defect, is the defect tested for in the regression test system? (If not explain why not.)
  • 3. If the issue can impact users, has an email to the users group been written (the email should specify if the defect impacts stable or master)?
  • 4. If the issue is a defect, does it impact the latest release branch? If yes, is there any issue tagged with release (create if needed)?
  • 5. If the issue is being closed without a pull request, has an explanation of why it is being closed been provided?
@Jimmy-INL Jimmy-INL added priority_minor priority_critical task This tag should be used for any new capability, improvement or enanchment RAVENv2.1 All tasks and defects that will go in RAVEN v2.1 labels May 10, 2021
@wangcj05 wangcj05 mentioned this issue Apr 26, 2022
9 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
priority_critical priority_minor RAVENv2.1 All tasks and defects that will go in RAVEN v2.1 task This tag should be used for any new capability, improvement or enanchment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants