updating for including second gpm to check applied aptc rather than eligibility #168
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
erubinst
changed the title
saipraveen18
approved these changes
Jan 8, 2025
nks2109
approved these changes
Jan 8, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/188754435
Previously:
Checked for AQHP using tax_household.is_aqhp. This is related to eligibility, but we need to be checking applied aptc to determine if we should include the second grace period month for NPT policies
Now:
If a policy has applied aptc at any point in the span, it is considered AQHP for these purposes. If a policy is eligible for APTC but never applies it, it is considered UQHP for these purposes