Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

more words to the abstract and intro section #3

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 12, 2022
Merged

Conversation

thomas-fossati
Copy link
Collaborator

Fix #2

Signed-off-by: Thomas Fossati thomas.fossati@arm.com

Fix #2

Signed-off-by: Thomas Fossati <thomas.fossati@arm.com>
@thomas-fossati
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/cc @ionut-arm

Copy link
Collaborator

@nedmsmith nedmsmith left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

minor wording issue

messages ({{Section 8 of -rats-arch}}).
messages that aim to achieve the goals stated above.

These encapsulation formats are designed to be:
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wording should say "there are two formats" rather than "designed to have two formats"

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't understand the editorial suggestion. It doesn't seem to apply to L83.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sounds like the suggested change would be along the lines of

Suggested change
These encapsulation formats are designed to be:
There are two encapsulation formats available:

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, but that doesn't work with what follows: the bulleted list describes the design criteria of the encaps, not the encaps themselves.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, right, I see now!

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

closing this and merging.

@thomas-fossati thomas-fossati merged commit 32412e9 into main Oct 12, 2022
@thomas-fossati thomas-fossati deleted the intro++ branch October 12, 2022 17:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Abstract & introduction
4 participants